Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Delacon

jackson was anti-secession over taxation and Calhoun

nobody ever tried to take his property with recompense

and the Brits had just emancipated with recompense so I bet that figured in his mind

I’m ambivalent on Jackson..I admire his mettle and he is a homeboy but he sure expanded Federal power

not good. there


24 posted on 09/17/2007 8:03:45 PM PDT by wardaddy (Pigpen lives!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
“jackson was anti-secession over taxation and Calhoun/
nobody ever tried to take his property with recompense/
and the Brits had just emancipated with recompense so I bet that figured in his mind

Seriously? I think that this proclamation is pretty unequivocal about secession. Come on. Jackson was an executive’s executive. I think he would not have condoned secession or revolt under his watch under any circumstances. He didn’t put up with much from the other branches of the federal government let alone outside of it(think defiance of SCOTUS Judge Marshall).

“I’m ambivalent on Jackson..I admire his mettle and he is a homeboy but he sure expanded Federal power”

I grew up in Tennessee. He is our homeboy. :)

26 posted on 09/17/2007 8:18:51 PM PDT by Delacon (When in doubt, ask a liberal and do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson