Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BritExPatInFla

Could be.

The IRS has a short list of points on IC vs Employee and the burden of proof is on the employer.

Done properly it works out well for all, as in the IT consultant that works for a fee or rate but is not an employee.

Done improperly you get employers who don’t pay taxes or insurance and end up screwing over the guys they hire.

*Some* security contractors have left their guys holding the bag when things go wrong because they don’t *owe* the same allegiance to ICs that they would to employees.


74 posted on 09/17/2007 8:39:13 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye

I think you said it right.

At least that’s what I’m getting from what I’ve read and heard.


82 posted on 09/17/2007 11:46:09 AM PDT by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson