“whites as a whole = 77% of the vote; blacks as a whole = 11% of the vote.
what freaking math could he do to make the black vote cover the white man vote deficit for the RATs ?”
Well, some theoretical answers using the numbers you provided (I’ll assume you didn’t make them up).
Well, presuming half of the whites were women, that puts white men at 38%...
Of those, probably a little more than half voted for Bush... So about 20%.
Did fully HALF of these voters once belong to the Democrat party? Even half = 10%, less than the number of blacks voting.
Well, I know less than 12 million blacks voted in the 2000 presidential election..
2004 couldn’t have had that much more.
I couldn’t find any demographics on the FEC site, so I used CNN exit polls.( don’t shoot me). and made giant assumption leaps.
Sorry for the histrionics...but 2-3% of 12 million voters is damn near statistically meaningless.
I believe the white male vote for GOP is higher than a little more than half...
in 2004, 62% of male peckerwoods voted for little Bush.
55% of white females
the lost demographic for white male candidates is black women....i think they would rather undergo chemo than vote for a conservative cracker
ever go to a government entity (codes, licenses, etc) and ask for help from some old black lady ?.....if you look and talk like I do (a less polished Fred with more hair) then they give you the Spike Lee blank stare over the glasses look.....I think younger black women are maybe more open to vote for a white guy