[muawiyah]

Just a mix of speculation and propaganda. There are certainly far more than 2,000 militarily significant targets in Iran ~ mentioning only 2,000 of them is designed (by the propagandists) to mislead the Iranian military into thinking we don't know everything.

At the same time most of this stuff comes from "W"'s critics who imagine that he's some sort of crazy warmonger.

That stuff's roughly on a par with our belief that if the Hildabeast takes over the government she's going to be diverting funds from her universal health care plan to secret detention camps where she's going to be rounding up and torturing Freepers ~ and that does not mean putting women's panties on our heads.

It really won't matter who is President if the Iranian ayatollahs get nuclear warheads and advanced missiles and begin picking off targets in Europe.

[txhurl]

Looks like Islam just might be a religion of peace once W gets done with it.

[mamelukesabre]

It really won’t matter who is President if the Iranian ayatollahs get nuclear warheads and advanced missiles and begin picking off targets in Europe.
~~~~~~~~~~~

I don’t see that ever happening. The iranians can get whatever they want from europe simply by threatening the use of force. They would never have to actually use force.

[bruinbirdman]

"There are certainly far more than 2,000 militarily significant targets in Iran ~"

Rumsfeld's plan, eh eh.

Brits retreat behind the moat. Sarko signs on? Israelis take out Syrian targets.

And we haven't started to rattle our sabers yet. Since we have been sending these signals, GW did pretty good on TV the other night, just how many cruise missiles have we stockpiled?

Use it or lose it. Is it about about time we tested some MOABs in a reality show? Bet we have more than 5.

Another task force in the gulf area would be a good hint.

Was it Henry Kissinger who said, "Tactical nuclear weapons are cheap and do a lot of damage." Oh, yeah, that was for the defense of West Europe, 1967.

"yitbos