Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shadow44
We don't have any need to invade and occupy Iran. We could do what needs done from the air.

If it DID become necessary to insert ground troops...we could do so on a limited basis and could do so effectively.

All that said, we would NEVER ATTEMPT an occupation of Iran. We'd just "break" it.

37 posted on 09/16/2007 12:59:53 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

My concern is that airstrikes would just give Iran a “legitimate” excuse to just blatantly mobilize its military elements in response. We’re not dealing with the most submissive people here. If we’re too aggressive, I fear it could just make things worse.


39 posted on 09/16/2007 1:09:51 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner; Shadow44

I concur with Mariner. Iran is likely one of those rare situations that can be solved with airpower alone. Their air force is no match for us, so we would have air dominance early on day one, killing everything that flies and taking out the ground-based air defense stuff. Then we can destroy the nuke facilities. After that it depends on goals. One option would be to destroy just the Revolutionary Guard and whatever mullahs we can get and then see how the Iranian regular military handles things from there. The other option is to crush their entire military as well as the Guard, and a third is to just keep going until their infrastructure is so ruined that they literally have to choose between nationhood and having a nuke program.


43 posted on 09/16/2007 1:14:38 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson