United Nations Jurisdiction Of The Seas ? - The Law Of The Seas Treaty

Red State ^ | Ken Taylor

[processing please hold]

it is hard to be subtle with language when it comes to depopulation.

Being subtle when it comes to mass murder, genocide and ethnic cleansing is a hard one to pull off.

[processing please hold]

True. I hadn’t thought of that.

[Calpernia]

Like LOST, Farm Bill, PAWs, the come from every direction to gain control. Subtle.

[nicmarlo]

True, it’s all alot of money, to us serfs.

But not to the elitists...either number, that’s crumbs to them.

[nicmarlo]

We gotta start thinking like the crooks.

: )

[processing please hold]

I've been reading about NGO's accredited with the un. Pure unabashed Israel hating, islam loving un.

If you have any extra time, take a peek at this.

http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?l=16&p=69

The very last picture at the bottome of the page, the woman in the white shirt, they confiscated it.

[processing please hold]

But not to the elitists...either number, that’s crumbs to them.

Agreed. Pocket change to them.

[o_zarkman44]

Bush is pushing this just like illegal immigrant amnesty.
Other than the WOT, I feel Bush has really dropped the ball for the American people. And fearfully, the DemoRats are even worse in subverting our sovergn nation.

[processing please hold]

I believe I could do that if inspired to do so. Except if it came to betraying my country for money or power like so many of out politicians are want to do.

After reconsidering, I wouldn't be any good at being a crook. lol

[o_zarkman44]

This is all about cash exchanging hands between wealthy people in different nations than it is about helping any dispute over territory.

[processing please hold]

Other than the WOT

How can a country fight the WOT if their borders are left wide open?

[o_zarkman44]

This treaty will work just like the nuclear non proliferation treaty. It hasn’t and it won’t.

[B4Ranch]

Without a doubt, this should solidify our faith and trust in the Republican Party forever. When a Republican President advances a treaty such a L.O.ST., then we know that the United States is secure under his judgement.

Knowing that our current batch of Republican Senators will jump on the bandwagon to get us firmly anchored in the New World Order as a full cash paying member makes me sleep like a baby, in his mothers arms, at night.

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting. UNaccountable bureaucrats BUMP!

[processing please hold]

If Biden pushes through L.O.S.T. The ICC will come to the forefront.

Did you know they're tweaking it behind the scenes?

[hedgetrimmer]

Sorry for any double pings, but LOST is back again!

[processing please hold]

You’re welcome. Thanks for checking it out.

[o_zarkman44]

Exactly what I am wondering.
Big picture. Bush is for opening our borders and allowing the United Nothings to run our business.
LOST could order our warships to stay in port when we need them to form an offensive or defensive position somewhere. And we would have to wait for a arbitartion panel of Unnies to decide, at their leisure, if our action is necessary.

This is woefully a rat fink sellout of sovergnity and I wonder the motive behind the WOT. could it be more for control of our people with surveillance and travel documents than about protecting our nation from foreign intrusion? UN running our business is not my idea of sovergnity. it too is a foreign intrusion.

[Calpernia]

Did you see my post 31? Bush is pushing revisions or something. We have been in a LOST treaty since the Clinton Admin.

Here is the Treaty disputes. Scroll down the table for USA.

http://www.un.org/Depts/los/settlement_of_disputes/choice_procedure.htm

And if you look at this post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897455/posts?page=78#78

It seems Bush can be tried criminally or something for violating the LOST treaty.

[Calpernia]

Make sure you read post 31