Posted on 09/16/2007 6:46:35 AM PDT by shrinkermd
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
I thought that you forgot the barf alert but then I saw the author’s name. That will suffice.
What’s funny is that if you really do look at this through the Vietnam prism, Petraeus is not Westmoreland, he’s Abrams, and Abrams is the one who had the war won when the Congress decided they’d rather lose it.
Thanks for the “Hear hear!”, Godring.
Sounds like you’ve been on the front lines.
You’re right, some think news is like ice cream: “Give ‘em what they like and ring up the sale.”
Yep..both in conservatism (my efforts were noted in a NY Times best seller--which is why it's humorous when I get questioned about my conservatism), and in the newspaper business (I've been editor of two newspapers).
Youre right, some think news is like ice cream: Give em what they like and ring up the sale.
In a market like the current one, that's a recipe for disaster, as entertainment will beat it out...and the folks looking for real news will not find your outlet trustworthy. (I say this having been out of the field directly for a while, but I do believe it's still true.)
Of the ice creamers, I'd ask: Why is a conservative lie better than a liberal one? Why be conservative if we don't believe the truth is on our side?
When a news organization shapes itself with an eye toward ratings/circulation, you get breaking news of OJ driving a white Bronco. Fundamentally, journalism is about self-promotion. Call yourself - or all your colleagues who will in turn call you - "objective," and you are promoting yourself. And that is the very opposite of objectivity.What you do not get is boring details of what the public has known for some time but has not demanded appropriate action on. Just like we heard very little of Osama ben Laden before 9/11. And just as we hear very little, actually, about the history of Clinton scandals which the Hsu scandal is simply repeating.
What we do hear is that claim that some Democrat scandal is "old news." As if that defined the public interest. What it does tend to do is define what interests the public - which is at best unrelated to the public interest, and frequently inimicable to it. To claim that something isn't important because it is already known is to claim that the Associated Press with its magic telegraphic newswire is always the definition of the public interest. And that is about as subjective an opinion as you are likely to encounter.
The NYT survived Walter Duranty.
But can they survive Frank Rich and Putz Sulzberger?
If they can.
Johnson and SecDef decided that U.S.S. Liberty should be written off and cancelled all efforts to go to their aid in 1967. They assumed it would sink but the crew of CTs and skipper sailed it backwards for 700 miles to port without any assistance from our Navy. Thanks Pres Johnson.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.