Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israelis ‘blew apart Syrian nuclear cache’(Israeli SpecOps was on the ground to direct bombing )
Times Online ^ | 09/16/05 | Uzi Mahnaimi in Tel Aviv, Sarah Baxter in Washington and Michael Sheridan

Posted on 09/15/2007 8:24:09 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

“On the ground, Syria’s formidable air defences went dead.”

This is the other quote I would love to hear the Who What where why and especially.... HOW?


41 posted on 09/15/2007 9:19:55 PM PDT by Walkingfeather (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

We’ve been following this for about a week, but the nuke angle is kinda new.


42 posted on 09/15/2007 9:20:13 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
the lack of information too is remarkable. I read that the IAF flew in from 2 directions.,...across Syria, jamming the Syrians' Russian made Pantsyr-S1 air defense missile system, and across Turkey.

Your point re. the Saudis etc is well taken. There is no love lost at present by Egypt, Jordan and the Saudis for Syria, since Assad started playing footsie with AquaVelvanijad. This may account for the crickets chirping.

I sure hope that you're right that we may begin making high impact surgical strikes in the near future. And I agree with your assessment of the impact of such strikes.

I can tell you that the Israelis have made enormous changes within the military establishment. They are not the same IDF that lurched through the last Hizbollah campaign.

Interestingly, they (the IDF) have had a surge in the number of Israelis who have signed up as career military, especially among the more religious Israelis, which is an interesting trend. This indicates an understanding, particularly among the Orthodox community of the dangers Israel is facing.

Additionally, many of this new influx have volunteered for Special Forces.

The chain of command has been totally retooled, training has been stepped up, training procedures have been corrected. The Israelis have not been messing around.

The smartest thing that they have done is to bring Barak in as Defense Minister. He's a schmuck politically, but he is enormously savvy militarily.

43 posted on 09/15/2007 9:22:37 PM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Suspicious lack of complaints -— frommany quarters.

But - IF - the commando team failed, or if they were cqptured or the planes were shot down, then we’d have heard about it certainly.

So, perhaps it is a success.


44 posted on 09/15/2007 9:23:13 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
"the Israelis proved they could penetrate the Syrian air defence system, which is stronger than the one protecting Iranian nuclear sites."

The Rooskies have a deal to sell about 50 new anti-aircraft systems to Syria. Iran has a deal to get 10 of those from Syria.

In any event, if the Syrians have any of them operable, I guess Iran has just learned what their value is.

yitbos

45 posted on 09/15/2007 9:24:48 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

We can observe and listen all we want but if the Shahab bases, the IRGC bases, the nuke facilities, the sub bases, the naval assets, etc... are all still there what good does it do us?

There comes a time when you have to stop watching and start acting

The other positive is that that can all be done with virtually no casualties and much higher public support


46 posted on 09/15/2007 9:25:44 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"In any event, if the Syrians have any of them operable, I guess Iran has just learned what their value is."

They're all operational. And they're worth bupkes, apparently.

47 posted on 09/15/2007 9:27:13 PM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

Agree totally. The time to act is now.


48 posted on 09/15/2007 9:28:38 PM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

Perhaps a HALO jump, e.g., high altitude, low opening parachute jump.


49 posted on 09/15/2007 9:29:28 PM PDT by miele man (Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It wasn’t nuclear.

We’ve been tracking and boarding all ships from North Korea with suspicious cargos.

It was a No Dong missile base that was destroyed in Syria.


50 posted on 09/15/2007 9:31:01 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

Having a guy who blasted his way through the streets of Beirut in a wig and a dress does tend to make one go for the gusto.

I thought given Gates’ CIA background he might be more apt for this, but he was in the DI and I guess has no zeal for the game.

Unfortunately for the IDF, Olmert is still in charge. Someone who takes a month to mobilize 30,000 guys, who keeps tens of thousands of troops mulling about on the border, who sends in battalion and brigade sized incursions, etc...

I’ve always felt that regardless of US action against Iran, Israel will never let them go nuclear. The difference is that Israel is probably limited to an Osirak like strike that takes out 1 or 2 locations whereas the USAF and Navy can totally eliminate Iran’s military infrastructure in a matter of days.


51 posted on 09/15/2007 9:32:15 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That’s the most comprehensive explanation I have seen to date on what might have happened. It’s troubling because we still don’t know exactly what the Syrians/NoKos/Mullahs were up to, and doubly troubling that the American Media is too busy trying to lose in Iraq to cover this...


52 posted on 09/15/2007 9:32:26 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Suspicious lack of complaints -— from many quarters

Sometimes there is no use complaining...when promises to come to mutual aid have been made...when frantic military preparations are underway...the arab neighbors of Israel certainly know the value of surprise by now...

53 posted on 09/15/2007 9:33:18 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: miele man
maybe...much trickier to extract, though... which makes this mission all the more intriguing..

Just as a thought...the target was in NE Syria...the shortest distance across Syria would be for the Shaldag commandos to enter Syria across the Iraq border....

Curiouser and curiouser...

54 posted on 09/15/2007 9:34:25 PM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Stuff like this reminds me of something I saw in the year or so after 9-11. At the time, I was monitoring the DOD solicitations for my business. One in particular caught my eye. I think it was one from DARPA, but I'm not positive.

The gyst of the solicitation was that they wanted proposals for research into systems that could detect nuclear material below X meters (I think X=30) from a satellite.

My mind immediately started spinning as to the implications of the wording. If we had nothing to detect nuclear material from a satellite already, it would have been "up to X meters." This specifically said "below X meters."

My point is that I have wondered since then if we monitor the globe for hot material and do what needs to be done. It's the stuff in bunkers, like in Iran, that frustrates our efforts.
55 posted on 09/15/2007 9:34:48 PM PDT by laxcoach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Sergei Kirpichenko, the Russian ambassador to Syria, warned President Bashar al-Assad last month that Israel was planning an attack, but suggested the target was the Golan Heights.

Suggests a successful Israeli disninformation campaign.

56 posted on 09/15/2007 9:35:08 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spyone

because they had a small force of israelis on ground they OWN the Syrians? I am as happy as the next guy that they did this, but let’s be realistic.


57 posted on 09/15/2007 9:36:12 PM PDT by steel_resolve (90 Guns per 100 Americans...You will never take us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Where were US planes that there could be some potential for mistaken attacks? Hmmmmm.

No surprise. The site was about 50 miles from the Iraqi border. A detection at long range with no satisfactory answer could lead to a long range engagement. Remember that the Phoenix missile could engage at greater than 50 miles.

58 posted on 09/15/2007 9:36:23 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
“On the ground, Syria’s formidable air defences went dead.”

This is the other quote I would love to hear the Who What where why and especially.... HOW?


Neither of us need to know. However, in 20 years I would love to buy beers for someone who can tell the story.
59 posted on 09/15/2007 9:37:43 PM PDT by Talking_Mouse (O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

also crystallizes Russian intent...


60 posted on 09/15/2007 9:37:47 PM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson