Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

It was for oil? Fine. With. Me.


5 posted on 09/15/2007 4:27:13 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (...."We're the govt, and we're here to hurt."....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods

Oil was a factor in the war but not in the way that Greenspan implies. With the sanctions lifted, SH would have had a large revenue stream to pursue terrorism and weapons. SH would have been happy to sell oil to finance his covert war against us. Oil is obviously a vital commodity. But SH wanted to sell oil to the highest bidder. He would not have withheld oil except in a time of war or as part of OPEC supply manipulation.


22 posted on 09/15/2007 4:34:40 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

Precisely! Would it be preferable that the oil resources of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, et cetera, be controlled by Islamofascistic terrorists? What an exquisitely powerful weapon of extortion that would be.


36 posted on 09/15/2007 4:48:46 PM PDT by Elsiejay (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson