Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rutgers Fans’ Abuse of Navy Players Elicits Media Yawn
Townhall.com ^ | September 15, 2007 | Robert Knight

Posted on 09/15/2007 4:53:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

It pays to be on the media’s approved victims list.

After Don Imus made his “ho” comment about the Rutgers women’s basketball team on April 4, the media went into a feeding frenzy. In the first week after the story broke, the three major networks aired a total of 19 segments. On cable, CNN had 60, with Fox News at 21 and MSNBC at 13.

The New York Times ran 12 articles, USA Today and The Washington Post each ran nine, and Newark, New Jersey’s Star-Ledger ran 11.

But after the Sept. 7 Navy-Rutgers football game, at which Rutgers fans crudely and obscenely abused the visiting Midshipmen players, fans and families, the media were nearly silent.

Star-Ledger columnist Mark DiLonno, a Rutgers grad and Navy veteran, broke the story on September 11 in a first-rate smackdown. He reminded the spoiled, face-painted kids in the stands that young men and women their age were risking their lives in the Navy and other services to defend their freedom. He also wondered why colleges were increasingly allowing such incivility to visiting teams.

As DiLonno reports it, here’s how some fans reacted when Navy kick returner Reggie Campbell got up limping after being tackled:

‘“You got f--ed up. You got f--ed up. You got f-ed-up,’ they chanted.

“Reggie Campbell is a senior. After graduation in June he has a five-year commitment to the American military, which, like it or not, is at war….

“Navy was booed and peppered with ‘You suck!’ chants when they stepped on the field for both halves. Toward the end of the second half, Rutgers students in the new bleacher section began to serenade the adjacent section of Navy fans and uniformed Midshipmen.

“‘F-- you, Navy. F--you, Navy. F-- you, Navy.’”

On Tuesday, Rutgers President Richard McCormick apologized to Naval Academy officials in a letter in which he said, “No student-athlete should ever be subject to profane language directed at them from the crowd, and certainly not the young men of the Naval Academy who have made a commitment to serve our nation in a time of war.”

Meanwhile, Rutgers athletic director Robert Mulcahy and Greg Blimling, vice president of student affairs, wrote an open letter saying the outbursts were “undignified, disrespectful and unacceptable.”

So how have the media responded? On Sept. 12, the Washington Post, UPI and AP ran less than 300 words each on the Rutgers officials’ apology. The New York Times, meanwhile, with Rutgers in its backyard, referred to the incident in the sixth paragraph of a Sept. 14 column by Harvey Araton about the overall Rutgers football program. The networks have ignored the incident completely.

In contrast, the media were all over the Imus incident from the beginning. When Imus apologized, they smelled blood in the water, and paid even more attention to the story.

Surely the outrageous behavior by the Rutgers fans should have elicited a national reaction and comparison to the Imus sacking, but the media’s collective yawn told the public: No big deal.

It might still be a smart PR move for the widely-publicized Rutgers women’s basketball team, which netted tremendous sympathy over Imus, to issue a press release lamenting the behavior of their school’s football fans. It could run along the lines of, “We know how it feels to be abused. …”

If nothing else, they might wind up on Oprah again.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: collegefootball; fword; rutgers; usna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: TN4Liberty

Actually, I copied the email to the two sports editors for the Greensboro News & Record. Didn’t hear from either of them as well.


21 posted on 09/15/2007 7:23:49 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Key question: How do Rutgers fans treat other visiting teams? The same? Then Navy has no beef. Neither does the author.


22 posted on 09/15/2007 7:28:30 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Really? If they are jerks at every game that makes it right? Unreal!!


23 posted on 09/15/2007 7:43:44 AM PDT by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tupac

Even if it is football, F-ck F-ck F-ck F-ck F-ck F-ck is not “intensity”, where I come from, and Tupac, spelled backward, (or shot with a hangun) is caput.


24 posted on 09/15/2007 7:44:42 AM PDT by flowerplough (Not a sociopath, merely a delusional narcissist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

sorry. That’s “handgun”. Have read that it was a .40 S&W. Not a bad round, but I’m a big enough guy that I prefer the original 10mm...


25 posted on 09/15/2007 7:49:31 AM PDT by flowerplough (Not a sociopath, merely a delusional narcissist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I attended a West Virginia University Mountaineers’ football game last year with the Cincinnati Bearcats, right around Veterans’s Day.

When they introduced some young West Virginia servicemen who had just returned from Iraq, the players and coaches from both team were standing, clapping, jumping up and down, and waving towels over their heads for these real heroes.

It made me proud to be an American, a native born West Virginian, and a Mountaineer football fan!!!

Take heart! There are still people out there who understand sacrifice and heroism doesn’t start and end on the gridiron.


26 posted on 09/15/2007 7:50:26 AM PDT by Robert Yoho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mortal19440
"Really? If they are jerks at every game that makes it right? Unreal!!"

No, if they are jerks at every game that makes them jerks. It doesn't make them anti-Navy, anti-military, or anti-American.

Headline: "Rutgers Fans Rude to Visiting Teams"

(yawn)

27 posted on 09/15/2007 7:54:55 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Headline: "Rutgers Fans Rude to Visiting Teams" (yawn)

The vulgar fans are rude not only to the visiting team. (In fact, the team is not likely to hear much of what the fans yell from the stands.) As another poster pointed out, the rudeness is often directed to the fans of the visiting team.

But that is not all. The rudeness also affects the fans of the home team. A few years ago, at the university where I teach, the behavior of the home crowd got so bad that many people refused to take their families to basketball games. (I do not know how things are now; I have not been to a game in years.)

Unfortunately, this is no longer considered news, as you indicated.

28 posted on 09/15/2007 8:39:52 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is my reply to the Rutger crowd...starts about 2:43 into the video

Bunch of p#ssies. The middies are going to be playing a much more violent game in the coming years than these limp d#cked so called men at Rutgers could ever imagine.

So Rutgers, I stand with my right arm fully extended, middle finger at attention and wish you well.

29 posted on 09/15/2007 9:08:31 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
"the behavior of the home crowd got so bad"

They have rights. Ask them.

Back in my day, the fans swiftly dealt with anyone who was vulgar -- especially vulgarity in front of their wife or children. Today, of course, we can't. The only way is to write yet another law.

Then people wonder -- why are there so many laws?

30 posted on 09/15/2007 9:38:18 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tupac

Tupac?Hey,didn’t you used to be a rapper?
Sorry about what happened in Vegas.


31 posted on 09/15/2007 9:44:42 AM PDT by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

More comments posted on yesterdays thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1896794/posts


32 posted on 09/15/2007 10:11:34 AM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson