Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The libs have already latched onto this garbage.
1 posted on 09/15/2007 3:05:24 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: chessplayer
Only 1 million? Bush is a total failure! He should have killed 100 billion, trillion, kajillion, quinbrillion people, mostly innocent children, in the most torturous way possible, by now.

For shame!

2 posted on 09/15/2007 3:06:56 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Who did they poll?
The dead?


3 posted on 09/15/2007 3:07:34 AM PDT by counterpunch (Ron Paul is gearing up to be Hillary Clinton's Ross Perot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

This statistical BS is based on a telephone poll of “1461 adults”, and yet the left is taking it as absolute truth. They like it and accept it because the number is higher than the one they had been using. By this time next year, they will be claiming at least 2 million deaths.


5 posted on 09/15/2007 3:12:36 AM PDT by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Wowza! So some months ago some Brit bullcrap report told us 600.000 died during the last 3 years. Now ONE year later the number has more than doubled!? Total, unadultered bullcrap.


6 posted on 09/15/2007 3:14:05 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

This is just more balderdash from one group of leftist that the rest of the leftist will use to disturb the peace. They do it all the time, not just concerning the war.


8 posted on 09/15/2007 3:20:40 AM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
A representative sample of 1,461 adults 18 or older answered this question:

"Q: How many members of your household, if any, have died as a result of the conflict in Iraq since 2003 (i.e, as a result of violence rather than a natural death such as old age)? Please note that I mean those who were actually living under your roof."

Results:

None - 78% One - 16% Two - 5% Three - 1% Four or more - 0.002%

Of those 1,461 questioned 78% said NONE of their relatives died. Now regardless of this, it is obvious that you can't extrapolate those small sample (if accurate at all) to the entire population, since conditions in each town and region are totally different.

12 posted on 09/15/2007 3:30:39 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
The terrorists intentionally target civilians.

Pelosi, Reid and company still want them to win.

Pathetic.

22 posted on 09/15/2007 5:14:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
The terrorists intentionally target civilians.

Pelosi, Reid and company still want them to win.

Pathetic.

23 posted on 09/15/2007 5:14:54 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
A British survey offers the highest estimate to date

This various surveys and polls regarding this issue have always lacked something. That missing something is common sense, which I would need before accepting any notion of accuracy.

America has been in Iraq for four years and approximately six months or 1640 days.

What would I have to believe if I were to accept the earlier estimate of 655,000 Iraqi civilian deaths due to America’s presence in Iraq? I would have to accept that there had been an average of 400 Iraqi civilian deaths each and every day for 1640 days without interruption.

What would I have to believe if I were to accept the new estimate of 1,000,000 Iraqi civilian deaths due to America’s presence in Iraq? I would have to accept that there had been an average of 610 civilian deaths each and every day for 1640 days without interruption.

I cannot recall a single day, much less 1640 days in a row, in which there were reports of 400 to 600 Iraqi civilian deaths.

Since this seems to be the next estimate, what would I have to believe if I were to accept a new estimate of 2,000,000 Iraqi civilian deaths due to America’s presence in Iraq? I would have to accept that there had been an average of 1220 civilian deaths each and every day for 1640 days without interruption.

There is a website that does seem to provide a reasonable amount of common sense regarding this issue. Iraq Body Count publishes estimates of between 72,000 and 79,000.

What would I have to believe if I were to accept the Iraq Body Count estimate of 80,000 Iraqi civilian deaths due to America’s presence in Iraq? I would have to accept that there had been an average of 49 civilian deaths each and every day for 1640 days without interruption. That seems to better approximate the figures I see reported. Based on the methods of reporting and the database the website describes I would recommend a visit to the web site. That is unless you feel your dogma would not be able to handle the visit.

25 posted on 09/15/2007 3:33:35 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson