Replies

Sorry DevSix, but I tend to agree with jeltz25 here - there is no substitute for developing your own human intelligence - and in 99.9 percent of situations like this we run the risk of having our informers turn on us.

I never suggested this wasn't the case - Having your own direct agents/sources for HUMINT is obviously the optimal choice - It only shortens one's OODA loop - (Which is just another reason to respect and love SecDef Rummy....Who allowed JSOC to go around the risk adverse OGA Intel apparatus...and gather their own).

I am all for DA type Intel Ops by our guys (snatch and grabs) out of these border regions (we should be doing more)....However, if you think within six years we are going to build a working team of Pashtun agents, put them into the Indian country of the Pak border regions and have them survive........That is foolishness, plain and simple (not within 6 years).

Again, there are a sizable number of brave souls....who have died headless up in these border regions....(The side they were on is clear - The notion that all get a "star" if KIA.....isn't reality.

"...if you think within six years we are going to build a working team of Pashtun agents, put them into the Indian country of the Pak border regions and have them survive..."

Okay, now this pretty much summarizes what I've been saying, and that is that maybe it's high time that we put an end to the "outsourced intelligence".

Our intelligence efforts are focused on recruiting foreign assets - why not recruit our own American assets instead?

An American Expat in Southeast Asia