Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS

I believe the whole Dark Ages label which used to be rather innocuous is now used to demean Western Civilization while at the same time to trumpet other non-Caucazoid civilizations

ala Boas and Diamond

the Dark Ages were not dark.

they were latin mostly pre-printing press


93 posted on 09/16/2007 10:10:25 AM PDT by wardaddy (WideAwakes is right now in meltdown.....the horror.....sniff sniff...ya'll please don't come back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy

Let me astound you by my mastery of trivia. First, the Dark Ages, strictly speaking, is a term devised by English historians to describe the history of Britain during the 6th Century. There is almost no documentation of this times before the Roman Mission reached Britain; what we know comes from Beade. The legend of Arthur is set during this time. Second, there were actually a lot of books availble during the Middle Ages, although they were expensive. Those monks, or whoever, were busy fellows. I have seen a copy of a “Paris” Bible of the 13th Century, a volume about the size of an ordinary Bible today, wriiten in Latin. I was amazed to see a book that looked like a printed Bible. And they were published by the thousands. Every friar in Europe seemed to have had one.


99 posted on 09/16/2007 12:04:01 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson