Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

I don’t believe that. Individuals in high tax states can deduct that portion paid to the state against that due the Fed.


13 posted on 09/14/2007 8:26:44 AM PDT by Jigajog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Jigajog
I don’t believe that. Individuals in high tax states can deduct that portion paid to the state against that due the Fed.

It's a fact. IIRC California gets back $0.74 on the dollar. Connecticut is the worst at over $2500 net outflow per capita. OTOH, the state with the highest net inflows is New Mexico. Here's per capita source data.

20 posted on 09/14/2007 8:44:31 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Jigajog

“I don’t believe that. Individuals in high tax states can deduct that portion paid to the state against that due the Fed.’

I think that is correct.
However, deductions taken for 401k investment serve to reduce taxable income, upon which is based the state income tax. Then when retirees relocate from an income-taxing state and begin to get back their invested funds, the income-tax-deprived previous state gets no handle on the retirement income. This irritates California greatly.


22 posted on 09/14/2007 8:50:11 AM PDT by gcruse (...now I have to feed the dog as if nothing has happened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson