To: Pablo64
To me this is the same thing as giving money to a suicide bomber’s family!
18 posted on
09/14/2007 5:41:14 AM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Then, I think you need to revisit your premise.
22 posted on
09/14/2007 5:42:29 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
("All gave some, and some gave all!")
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A suicide bombers family endorses what he/she does and glorifies it. This murderer’s family did no such thing. To compare the two makes no sense.
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Yeah,
lets just kill his kids too, they’ll probably grow up just like him.../sarcasm.
You need a hug, doncha?
27 posted on
09/14/2007 5:49:39 AM PDT by
najida
(Just call me a chicken rancher :))
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
From all of the "exposes" on how one becomes a homicide bomber, the family members usually seem to encourage their sons, brothers and nephews into the act--not force them, but give them the big thumbs up.
I have yet to see any evidence that the widow Roberts or her children encouraged their spouse/father into the massacre which he alone perpetrated.
Have you ever sinned? Done something stupid? C'mon, share with the class. Then we can go after your family.
31 posted on
09/14/2007 6:01:04 AM PDT by
grellis
(Femininists for Fred!)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Yeah, because I'm sure that before he went out that morning his kids all begged him to take hostages, kill people, then kill himself and leave them without a father.
Do I really need the sarcasm tag, or can you figure this one out for yourself?
34 posted on
09/14/2007 6:04:54 AM PDT by
Pablo64
(National Alpaca Farm Day is 9-29-07. Visit an alpaca farm near you!)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
To me this is the same thing as giving money to a suicide bombers family!I would see no problem with that as long as the family wasn't involved in encouraging him to be a suicide bomber. You can't blame a whole family for the actions of one member.
50 posted on
09/14/2007 6:49:20 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Not even close. None of them are reported to be dancing in the street & passing out candy or saying how proud they are of him.
52 posted on
09/14/2007 6:53:48 AM PDT by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
If you believe that, then you need to take Logic 101.
The wife and children had absolutely nothing to do with his mental demise.
55 posted on
09/14/2007 7:03:00 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Sounds like you could learn something from their message:
“It is understood that hostility destroys community,” it said.
57 posted on
09/14/2007 7:05:04 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I don’t think the two are related in any way shape or form. Suicide bombers are doing their deeds in order to force their ideology on society. The gunman was just nuts and seriously whacked. The wife and children probably were as clueless as the poor Amish girls were to what was going on in his mind.
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A dubious assertion, as Islamoterrorist homicide bombers often are praised by their families for their murderous acts, sent on their way with appeals for Allah’s blessing. No such familial sentiments attended the shooter of the Amish children.
64 posted on
09/14/2007 9:32:19 AM PDT by
Elsiejay
(,)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Not the same because the suicide bomber’s family approves of what the suicide bomber is doing.
83 posted on
09/14/2007 8:19:47 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson