Replies

RUSH: Three small little observations here, and this, to me, is the most obvious question about Norman Hsu. Here is the most obvious question: How is it conceivable that the Clinton people don't know who he is and don't know his background? For somebody to have contributed that much money, he would have demanded something in return. People do not make donations of this size for ideas. You people sending $25, $50, you're sending your ideas in. Somebody like this, who is out there raising money, bundling money from people who don't have it, is expecting something in return for this. For that to happen, they have to know who he is and who he represents. You cannot return favors, unless you know who you're supposed to deliver to. This, to me, is the most obvious question about this, and this, ladies and gentlemen, is why I am host.

Also, you remember back in one of the first reporting periods of campaign fundraising when Obama had overtaken Hillary? You remember the, "Oh, my God, why, look at that, why, how can this be?" There was a story around that time that came and went, folks. Hillary's campaign had accidentally doubled some contributions, because she had to roll back her total number. She had accidentally doubled some contributions and noticed that some contributions were checks that bounced. This happened when the action line was the fundraising contest between Obama versus Hillary, and she originally put out some false numbers, that she was way ahead, and that was what was first reported. Then a week or so later, some days later, "By the way, we need revise our numbers." After everybody had already got the first number in their head, "Oh, wow, look at Hillary, she is really raising a lot of money." They had to revise the numbers down a little bit. And, of course, can we forget -- we cannot, can we? -- the cattles future scandal where Mrs. Clinton invested $10,000 in the cattle futures market, what, six months later the ten grand became a hundred grand, and they asked her, "How did this happen?" "Well, I read the Wall Street Journal." Remember that? Well, when did she stop reading the Wall Street Journal for cattle tips? You talk about suspending belief? How about Hillary making a hundred grand off ten grand in a matter of a few months?

Here's another thing, folks. Let's take her at her word. She didn't know who the guy was, couldn't find him, couldn't uncover one bit of information about Norman Hsu. Despite this incredible vetting process, Wolfson couldn't do it, the punk couldn't do it, Terry McAuliffe couldn't do it. She wants to be president of the United States. Do you realize how many things over the years she's admitted to not knowing? This makes her totally inept. If we take her at her word, that she didn't know, she is totally inept, ladies and gentlemen, especially her own past with money. Her self-assumed victim-hood with the media. This is an accident waiting to happen if this woman takes it far.

Answere ......

Hillary knew the Hsu.

Hillary picked the Hsu, precisely because he had a felony record.

That way, if or when Hsu was outed for laundering, everything could be pinned on the Hsu.

The donors to Hsu could claim victim hood, in that they were robbed, and the Shrew, Hillary, could claim the same.

The Hsu was used to dirty up Kerry, the man who announced that Clintons were Liars.

The dirty little secret is that Hsu was used.
No way were the Clintons were unaware. They have email trails to cover their tracks,IE, “Hsu is Legit”. Thats just preemptive cover.