1 posted on
09/13/2007 12:44:28 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: SkyPilot
No matter what was spent, it was a complete waste of money.
To: SkyPilot
I think MoveOn should have to pay taxes on the other 2/3 of this cost — wasn’t it about $180K total? They could call it a donation. I love it that Giuliani wants to run an ad for the same price as MOo paid. haha.
35 posted on
09/13/2007 2:32:26 PM PDT by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: SkyPilot
Regardless of what they charged, they didn’t have to accept such a tasteless and seditious ad. They would deserve all the heat that could be focused at them if they charged twice the normal rate.
41 posted on
09/13/2007 5:17:08 PM PDT by
Duke Nukum
(He burns at the center of time and he sees the turn of the Universe.)
To: SkyPilot; MurryMom
Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis denied the rate charged indicated a political bias and said it was the paper's policy not to disclose the rate paid by any advertiser.ALWAYS believe what the Times says. Always...
42 posted on
09/13/2007 5:51:08 PM PDT by
Libloather
(That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson