[mnehring]

So, pointing out that Paul says one thing and votes for another, is being ‘nasty to his supporters’..hmmm...

[Harvey105]

Forgive me. I meant to post to ‘all’.

In general, do you not see how nasty his detractors are, both in their attacks on Paul and those who support him?

The comments don’t stop at ‘he’s wrong’ or ‘you’re wrong’. Almost every post gets nasty and personal. Do you not see how that might come into play when real votes are needed to support your candidate? Why antagonize these potential voters?

No, hardly any of them would switch from Paul to Rudy, but what about to Fred or Duncan?

All I am saying is stick to issues and leave out the nastiness (generally speaking, not personally to you) that is unless you believe that who ever the GOP candidate is can overcome the Dem onslaught and voter fraud on his own. Can you afford to piss off the Paul supporters, even if there are only 1000 of them in any given state?

[Xenalyte]

So, pointing out that Paul says one thing and votes for another, is being ‘nasty to his supporters’..hmmm...

Um, no. Calling us stupid names and telling us you don't need our votes to win would, I think, be more in line with Harvey's point.