Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasAg1996
He's said he wants to withdraw troops from Japan and Korea, and he's mentioned withdrawing troops from Europe. And he said in an interview last month that defensive treaties with countries like Britain were not constitutional.

Well, wanting to withdraw troops is not the same as breaking treaties, as you well know.

Right now we have agreements with those countries that our troops should be there. Those agreements can be changed through diplomatic channels prior to bringing our forces back home. If a hypothetical President Paul thought them unconstitutional, then he should work to change them.

But the international repercussions of just yanking troops, in violation of treaty and without preamble, would be awful. It would be a profoundly Stupid Move...on that I think we can both agree.

But I also believe that Ron Paul probably knows that, understand that the ship of state takes a long time to get turned around, and wouldn't do something so profoundly stupid.

113 posted on 09/12/2007 11:33:18 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Oberon
and wouldn't do something so profoundly stupid.

I'd call announcing to the world that the mutual defense treaties we have with countries like Britain are unconstitutional (and therefore wouldn't be supported by a Ron Paul presidency) is just as monumentally stupid.
114 posted on 09/12/2007 11:37:29 AM PDT by TexasAg1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson