Brush up on your history skills in addition to your English and grammar skills. Abortion was regulated by the states prior to Roe vs Wade. Overturning Roe vs Wade would send the decision back to the states so it can be duked out locally instead of federally.
Not that Paul has the slightest chance of nomination by any real political party, but he would nominate what to the SCOTUS??? Libertoonian moonbats??? People who spend their waking hours in pseudo-"constitutionalist" contortions???
Well, it's moot anyway since Paul ain't going to win, right? Hypothetically if he were elected, Paul would nominate constitutionalists to the bench.
Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo would not waste time looking for libertoonian crazies but would nominate SCOTUS justices in the mode of Scalia or Thomas or Roberts or Alito.
So would Dr. Paul. Good grief, have you even looked at Paul's positions outside of his foreign policy? He runs rings around the other GOP candidates.
When Roe is no more, then we go for federal personhood, hopefully in the same decision after about two more SCOTUS appointments.
You overturn Roe FIRST then you go for the Constitutional Amendment. Do you know how long it will take to pass a Constitutional Amendment? Do you think CA or NY or IL will ratify it? Send the decision back to the states and you'll save more babies in the interim than farting around trying to amend the Constitution as more babies die on the vine. Use your head.
On abortion as on war, paleoPaulie is a gutless two-faced do nothing wimp. He will never be acceptable as a GOP nominee for POTUS.
You are completely smoking crack if you believe Dr. Paul is pro-abortion. The man delivered over 4,000 babies. Well, I guess they were those toy babies that single first-time mothers use then.
Which part of "when Roe is no more" are you refusing to understand?
If a "constitutionalist" would resist outlawing abortion altogether, thanks but no thanks!
I sure have looked at Dr. Demento's other positions. He says he is pro-life but does not want to violate the constitution (as he imagines it) by actually DOING anything about it, but nonetheless files a pro-life bill while posing for holy pictures and DOING nothing about it to satisfy the libertoonian moonbats. Earmarks: He demands them for his district so they wil be crammed into bills passed by others' votes while he poses for holy pictures voting against the appropriations bills containing them. He makes Lon Chaney in The Wolfman seem like Mr. Chis in terms of mental and policy stability. Yeah, I have looked at his record.
Paul may not have aborted babies but he isn't trying to stop those who do. Most abortionists have delivered babies. That Paul has delivered 4,000 proves nothing relevant. I don't doubt that he believes abortion is not good. I also don't doubt that he has no plans on ending it by federal enactment.
We simply need a SCOTUS majority to use the 14th Amendment to recognize the personhood of the unborn and to outlaw abortion accordingly. No new amendment is necessary although it would be nice to have one on that and against lavender make believe marriage for two subjects.
What I said was that paleoPaulie is a gutless two-faced do nothing wimp on abortion and on war and that stands.