Achmedinejad has his goals and he has his reasoning for carrying out those goals just like Stalin had his goals and he had his reasoning for carrying out those goals. I wouldn't call Stalin a fool. He was just a very very evil man. His maneuvering more than anything else made the Soviet Union a temporary superpower. Dismissing him as a fool who doesn't follow logic was the mistake of many of his enemies that were crushed ruthlessly. For the same reason, I would not dismiss Achmedinejad as a fool. And I would not only focus on what we think is his intent. Before you know it he may perform a play-fake on us while we are unaware.
Just because one doesn't assign 'logic' to a fool like Ahmadinejad doesn't mean one misinterprets that fool's intent.
Your entire reply:
Achmedinejad has his goals and he has his reasoning for carrying out those goals just like Stalin had his goals and he had his reasoning for carrying out those goals. I wouldn't call Stalin a fool. He was just a very very evil man. His maneuvering more than anything else made the Soviet Union a temporary superpower. Dismissing him as a fool who doesn't follow logic was the mistake of many of his enemies that were crushed ruthlessly. For the same reason, I would not dismiss Achmedinejad as a fool. And I would not only focus on what we think is his intent. Before you know it he may perform a play-fake on us while we are unaware.
Wherein do I imply we don't take Achmedinejad or any of these 'fools' seriously? Wherein do I imply we dismiss them. In fact, I specifically stated "doesn't mean one misinterprets that fool's intent". We full well understand the implications stemming from Iran and elsewhere. Because we call him a fool doesn't mean we dismiss him. It's Ron Paul who doesn't either understand or accept them based on his statement that we don't face a current threat. It's Ron Paul who dismisses him. Look to Ron Paul for clarification; not me.