Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
“So, you want to compare the combustibles, not the energy release”

And in a thermobaric, where does the energy release come from?

And death by suffocation over five minutes? What do you mean?

Thermobaric bombs don’t have a terribly negative oxygen balance, due to the type of fuel used. If they did, you’d never get all of the fuel to detonate. TNT is quite oxy negative by contrast.

A gasoline-based FAB or thermobaric would be limited to the air in the immediate vicinity. That’s why they don’t use it.

If you want to believe that the Russian thermobarics can completely eliminate human life within three miles you are free to do so, but I remain skeptical.

66 posted on 09/11/2007 7:42:25 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow
Just human life down in a qanat ~ it's not like you're working against an enormous atmosphere ~ just a local network of tunnels that another type of bomb would have difficulty reaching.

No doubt you'd explode this thing fairly close to the ground.

69 posted on 09/11/2007 7:48:24 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
Besides, the target would be the bio- and chemical weapons down in the qanats, not necessarily all the human beings in the area.

Bet this sucker works great on bacteria.

72 posted on 09/11/2007 7:49:41 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson