Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow
I read the article to claim a three-mile diameter of destruction -- not a three-mile radius...

In any case, I'd class it as a genuine "WMD"...

53 posted on 09/11/2007 7:25:44 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: TXnMA

That’s why I put in the 30% at 1.6 mile radius, because I wasn’t sure what they meant.

So they still are claiming better performance, even if you consider a 3.2 mile diameter.

Yeah, it’s a fearsome weapon, but any 11 ton bomb would be.


55 posted on 09/11/2007 7:29:17 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson