[BillF]

Thanks for proving my last post and prediction:

Your next post, if any, will again inadvertently confirm that there is no specific SPP language that gives a legislative power to a foreigner. . . . Otherwise, you would simply list the power and the language that delegates it.

Kindly get back to me when you are willing to list the legislative power and the SPP language that delegates it.

[nicmarlo]

Right after you provide something other than your own opinions that Schlafly, as you claim, is in err or wrong.

So far, you’ve documented nothing to back up your claims, as I requested, since my very first post to you.

[nicmarlo]

To: BillF; texastoo; Kimberly GG; WorkerbeeCitizen; potlatch; hedgetrimmer but he [Calderon] realized that the SPP does NOT implement that plan.

Please document your assertions; everything I have read, and all those whom I have pinged have read, which includes, but is not restricted to, the SPP document itself, contradicts your assertions.

28 posted on 09/12/2007 7:28:00 PM EDT by nicmarlo a

Still waiting, since 9/12/07 at~7:30 p.m. Glad I'm not holding my breath.

[Paul Ross]

proving my last post and prediction:

Neither was.