[BillF]

Thanks for your latest kind responses. Two responses in less than 5 minutes after my last post. Your speed when you have "little time" is impressive, but not as impressive as if you had kindly responded to a straightforward question.

If I was in error in saying that "Schlafly's claim of such a delegation of U.S. legislative powers to a foreigner is wrong," that would be easy to show by pointing to specific SPP language that gives such a legislative power to a foreigner. It would have taken a lot less time than you're spent, but you can't do it, thus confirming that Schlafly is wrong about that.

You say that you won't do it (i.e., point to specific SPP language that gives a legislative power to a foreigner), but it's clear that you can't do it. If you could, this would be over.

You've the one, not me, who claimed to be well-read on the SPP, but you are unable to answer the simplest question about it.

Your next post, if any, will again inadvertently confirm that there is no specific SPP language that gives a legislative power to a foreigner. Indeed, every additional time that you post, it confirms that no such delegation of a legislative power is given to a foreigner under SPP. Otherwise, you would simply list the power and the language that delegates it.

[nicmarlo]

Your speed when you have "little time" is impressive, but not as impressive as if you had kindly responded to a straightforward question.

If you think that responding to your drivel requires much effort, exertion, or time, you not only have over-exaggerated the importance of your opinions, but your self-absorbed posts, as well.

As I stated earlier, get back to me when you have something of importance to state, like, linking/posting any kind of evidence to back up your character assassinations against Schlafly.