Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Mitt Romney on the Campaign Trail" (Q & A with Hugh Hewitt)
ElectRomneyin2008.com ^ | September 8, 2007 | Mike Laub

Posted on 09/11/2007 1:01:26 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

Hugh Hewitt: Pleased to welcome back to the Hugh Hewitt Show former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. Governor, welcome back, good to have you.

Mitt Romney : Thank you, good to be with you, Hugh.

Hugh Hewitt: We’ve watched a lot of these free swim debates, including last night’s, Governor. When do we get a Rudy -Mitt-Fred debate that people will actually want to watch, as opposed to…we like the other people, don’t get me wrong, but it’s very disjointed, and the top tier guys would be a great presentation.

Mitt Romney : You know, I’m beginning to pine away for that myself. Of course, first, we’ve got to have Fred there. But once we get Fred there, then we can narrow it down, perhaps. But you know, the other guys want to be heard, and I think one of the reasons that a lot of guys get into this race is for the chance to be heard, and to have their message impact the body politick in the country. So you know, it’s going to be a long time, I’m afraid, before we actually have that kind of an exchange to and fro. It’s one of the frustrations, of course, in the debates, is that someone says something you disagree with, and you’re onto the next topic before you’re able to comment on it.

Hugh Hewitt: Last night, for example, Senator McCain went after you for using the word apparently. Your reaction to that?

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.electromneyin2008.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; hagiography; mittromney; romney

1 posted on 09/11/2007 1:01:30 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; beaversmom; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; borntoraisehogs; ..

Great Q & A with Hugh Hewitt.


2 posted on 09/11/2007 1:02:44 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


3 posted on 09/11/2007 1:04:21 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

The RINO enabler and the centrist moderate meet face to face on the campaign.

Too much for me.


4 posted on 09/11/2007 1:04:51 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Hewitt’s a RINO; he’s consistently picking the Establishment RINO choice; no Thanks!


5 posted on 09/11/2007 1:41:05 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Which is which? You guys should publish a list of “formerly conservative commenators” so the rest of us can keep up. I hear Sean Hannity is on the outs now.


6 posted on 09/11/2007 2:07:31 PM PDT by asparagus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

I don’t know about you, but all they ever say is “RINO this,” “RINO that.” I would not be supporting Mr. Romney (and neither would Hugh Hewitt) if this was the case. I guess using the word “RINO” has become a macho-thing now. No one is ever happy, I suppose. Gees.


7 posted on 09/11/2007 2:20:36 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: asparagus
>>>>>Which is which?

Doesn't matter.

9 posted on 09/11/2007 2:28:57 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
H.H.When do we get a Rudy -Mitt-Fred debate that people will actually want to watch, as opposed to…

M.R.You know, I’m beginning to pine away for that myself. Of course, first, we’ve got to have Fred there. But once we get Fred there, then we can narrow it down, perhaps. But you know, the other guys want to be heard, and I think one of the reasons that a lot of guys get into this race is for the chance to be heard, and to have their message impact the body politick in the country. So you know, it’s going to be a long time,

No leadership shown in Mitt's answer.

10 posted on 09/11/2007 2:44:18 PM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

~”...the centrist moderate...”~

Wow, it looks like Romney’s moving right in your book. Good news.


11 posted on 09/11/2007 4:42:20 PM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Hugh Hewitt: Last question takes me back to Michigan, Governor, and take as much time as you want, because it’s important. The head of Toyota North America went to save Chrysler today. It’s a big move. And as you said, Michigan depends on the automobile industry, as does a lot of the United States. What ought the government to be doing to help Michigan and the automobile industry generally, because that state’s hurting?
Mitt Romney : Well, you know, there are a number of other states that have been able to attract jobs and manufacturing from around the world. And they’ve done so by putting in place tax incentives and other enticements for people to come to their state, and by having progressive labor policies that make it attractive for companies to move there. That’s of course up to Michigan. Those steps suggest that you’ve got a Michigan problem, not an American problem. And the federal government isn’t going to solve a Michigan problem. That’ll be done by the governor there or the legislature. But what the federal government can do for the auto industry is to make sure that we are investing in new technology, and that we’re at the cutting edge with fuel economy, material science, automotive technology, the kind of research that the government can do in conjunction with, if you will, a public-private partnership, which can be licensed to our companies, and can fuel their growth, and their competitiveness long term. Of course, we’re also going to have to see that unions and the companies themselves work to be more effective in pulling back on some of the burdens they’ve placed on enterprises. You know, I’m disappointed when I see executives making money that roils the rest of the employee base of an enterprise, and I’m concerned when I see excessive benefits that put in jeopardy the future of an enterprise as well. So it’s going to take everybody coming together to make sure that we maintain the vitality and strength of the American automobile industry, and in my view, that’s an important job that needs to be done, and I’ll be happy to lead that as president.

Although Hugh is conservative, he asked a liberal question: what can the federal government do to help Michigan and the auto industry? I think answering these kinds of questions are hard for conservatives. I think Mitt did a good job. I liked his characterization that at least some of the problem was a “Michigan problem” that cannot be solved by the US government. Has President Bush or any of his personnel, or anybody in politics, noted a “Louisiana problem?” Or a “New Orleans problem?” Not to my knowledge. And note, Mitt is saying this before campaigning in Michigan. There are some other things that I like about his answer. Even the one thing that I didn’t like so much, I can live with.
12 posted on 09/11/2007 5:54:38 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Reagan dismantled the Russian empire of 21 conquered nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Hugh Hewitt: Last question takes me back to Michigan, Governor, and take as much time as you want, because it’s important. The head of Toyota North America went to save Chrysler today. It’s a big move. And as you said, Michigan depends on the automobile industry, as does a lot of the United States. What ought the government to be doing to help Michigan and the automobile industry generally, because that state’s hurting?
Mitt Romney : Well, you know, there are a number of other states that have been able to attract jobs and manufacturing from around the world. And they’ve done so by putting in place tax incentives and other enticements for people to come to their state, and by having progressive labor policies that make it attractive for companies to move there. That’s of course up to Michigan. Those steps suggest that you’ve got a Michigan problem, not an American problem. And the federal government isn’t going to solve a Michigan problem. That’ll be done by the governor there or the legislature. But what the federal government can do for the auto industry is to make sure that we are investing in new technology, and that we’re at the cutting edge with fuel economy, material science, automotive technology, the kind of research that the government can do in conjunction with, if you will, a public-private partnership, which can be licensed to our companies, and can fuel their growth, and their competitiveness long term. Of course, we’re also going to have to see that unions and the companies themselves work to be more effective in pulling back on some of the burdens they’ve placed on enterprises. You know, I’m disappointed when I see executives making money that roils the rest of the employee base of an enterprise, and I’m concerned when I see excessive benefits that put in jeopardy the future of an enterprise as well. So it’s going to take everybody coming together to make sure that we maintain the vitality and strength of the American automobile industry, and in my view, that’s an important job that needs to be done, and I’ll be happy to lead that as president.

Although Hugh is conservative, he asked a liberal question: what can the federal government do to help Michigan and the auto industry? I think answering these kinds of questions are hard for conservatives. I think Mitt did a good job. I liked his characterization that at least some of the problem was a “Michigan problem” that cannot be solved by the US government. Has President Bush or any of his personnel, or anybody in politics, noted a “Louisiana problem?” Or a “New Orleans problem?” Not to my knowledge. And note, Mitt is saying this before campaigning in Michigan. There are some other things that I like about his answer. Even the one thing that I didn’t like so much, I can live with.
13 posted on 09/11/2007 5:55:03 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Reagan dismantled the Russian empire of 21 conquered nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin too. Not Fredheads. Don’t know if they are officially RINOs now or not though.


14 posted on 09/11/2007 5:56:49 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Ann Romney and Josh Romney were in SLC this morning (Sept 12.) They are very articulate positive people. They talked about traveling around the country and meeting good American people and how they have hope for America, due to its citizens.


15 posted on 09/12/2007 2:32:18 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson