I'm sure the official explanation of Sept. 11 was riddled with inaccuracies
Why? What makes him SURE that the "official explanation" is "riddled with inaccuracies"?
For that statement to be true, you HAVE to believe that the people putting together the "official explanation" are TRYING to hide the truth. After all, if they are well-meaning people doing the best they can to get the truth right, how could it possibly be "obvious" that their explanation is riddled with errors? Wouldn't each error be corrected if they wanted to get it right?
No, he denounces the belief in conspiracies, but he credits the same hypothesis as those who believe in conspiracies, the idea that there is some "official explanation" concocted by the "powers that be" that is always looking to hide the truth and instead provide the "appropriate" message.
It's the message of 1984. Once you believe it is in force today, you'd be crazy NOT to believe in the conspiracy, because you've already bought it lock, stock, and barrel.
If one lets lie the statement "...the official explanation of Sept. 11 was riddled with inaccuracies..." it opens up all kinds of possibilities.
And that is just the way they operate.