Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP must avert Senate primary fight, McInnis says
The Daily Sentinel ^ | September 11, 2007 | MIKE SACCONE

Posted on 09/11/2007 9:09:03 AM PDT by george76

Former Grand Junction Congressman Scott McInnis said Delta County Commissioner Wayne Wolf’s decision to vie for the Republican nomination for outgoing Sen. Wayne Allard’s seat could be bad for the party.

McInnis, who was briefly the only Republican candidate in the 2008 Senate race, said Wolf’s candidacy could prove more of a “distraction” than an asset for the Colorado GOP next year.

“I think he’s a fine guy,” McInnis said. “I’m just worried at this point that a primary is going to serve as a distraction to the primary target, which is Mark Udall, and that the Republicans, in order to be victorious in that race, have to, if they can, avoid a primary and get behind one candidate.”

McInnis said the Republican primary battles between Pete Coors and Bob Schaffer in the 2004 Senate race and Bob Beauprez and Marc Holtzman in the 2006 gubernatorial race showed how problematic intra-party contests can be.

He said it would be unfortunate for the party if Wolf’s candidacy proved problematic for Schaffer’s second bid for the U.S. Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at gjsentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bobschaffer; mcinnis; schaffer; scottmcinnis

1 posted on 09/11/2007 9:09:05 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Walt Klein, chief campaign consultant for Schaffer, said ...


2 posted on 09/11/2007 9:10:37 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Walt Klein, chief campaign consultant for Schaffer, said ...

I am glad there is no bias in that opinion.

3 posted on 09/11/2007 9:12:26 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, everyone who already declares always wants to be annointed rather have to compete in a primary and you generally dismiss this kind of comment. But I will give the guy this . . . his opponent is a county commissioner? A County Commissioner? A county commissioner wants to run for US Senate? Whatever happened to running for state legislature and then maybe US Congress to get some experience campaigning and debating first?


4 posted on 09/11/2007 9:17:55 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76
If this is really a concern then Scott McInnis could do the honorable thing and step aside.
5 posted on 09/11/2007 9:18:29 AM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Chef SittinYonder's recipe for a Liberal America:

Take one moderate Republican

Add water

Voila! I call it: "Watered down Conservatism"

6 posted on 09/11/2007 9:19:23 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I love the fact that more than one candidate wants to run. It makes people honest and forced to discuss issues. I want about five more to run too. Only the strongest will ultimately win. I like that!!!


7 posted on 09/11/2007 9:20:14 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
I should note, I'm not calling McInnis a moderate, I'm just opposed to the idea of no primary race. McInnis - his politician tendencies aside, is a pretty solid conservative.
8 posted on 09/11/2007 9:23:52 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76

What happened?

I thought McInnis was not going to run and that Bob Schaffer was running?

What have I missed....


9 posted on 09/11/2007 9:28:24 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (To libs killing a windfarm is bad, letting a gal die in your Oldsmobile is not so bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
The person saying this is McGinniss, who apparently was a candidate for this seat at one point but dropped out to support Shaeffer.

HERE is what Walt Klien said: Walt Klein, chief campaign consultant for Schaffer, said the former congressman really did not have much of a reaction to Wolf’s intent to run for Allard’s seat.

I don't know why you didn't quote what he said, but the implication that he was the one quoted in the piece is wrong.

10 posted on 09/11/2007 9:34:41 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

He already did, when Bob entered the race. Bob barely lost the primary against Coors in 2004, then Coors fell apart and was beat by Salazar. Bob would have won that race.


11 posted on 09/11/2007 9:35:56 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

Nothing, it’s the others who missed what the article actually said.

McInnis is saying that Wolf should not enter the race, because the Colorado Republican Party can’t stand another contentious primary.

I generally like primaries but given how they have backfired twice now in Colorado, I’m thinking he may be right.


12 posted on 09/11/2007 9:37:30 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman; colorado tanker

McInnis is not running and Bob Schaffer is running...

http://www.bobschaffer.org/


13 posted on 09/11/2007 9:41:49 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: george76
Yes, McInnis pulled out of this race quite a while ago.

I'm not sure this matters. I may be wrong, but I don't see Wolf as enough of a player to even come close to Shaffer in a primary. Still, I'd rather there be no primary.

14 posted on 09/11/2007 10:11:31 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Bob needs to save his money for the main event.

Apparently Wolf wants some state wide exposure ?


15 posted on 09/11/2007 10:18:07 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Owen
"Whatever happened to running for state legislature and then maybe US Congress to get some experience campaigning and debating first?"

...the same thing that happened to putting a few years in the service as a young man. No doubt, you could ask all the candidates running in both parties and get a blank stare.

16 posted on 09/11/2007 10:20:55 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Isn’t there a poll showing Udall leading by 45-40. Given that Udall has a huge cash advantage over Schaffer being 5 points behind isn’t too bad.


17 posted on 09/11/2007 10:20:59 AM PDT by Kuksool (RATS occupy Red States due free passes by conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

This may pop up some next year :

Sept. 11 is the anniversary of a date when Americans going about their business were killed in cold blood by religious zealots: This is the 150th anniversary of the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

It happened near Cedar City, Utah. Just about everything except the date and location remain subjects of contention to this day.

Just how many died remains unknown, with estimates ranging from 80 to 130. Various investigations were interrupted by the Civil War, and the extent of formal LDS involvement is something historians and history buffs still argue about.

The only person formally charged in the massacre was John Doyle Lee, local constable and Indian agent. He was tried and convicted, then executed by a firing squad in 1877 at Mountain Meadows.

Lee’s great-great-grandson, Mark Udall, is running for U.S. Senate from Colorado.

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_6854183


18 posted on 09/11/2007 10:25:03 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Yes, there is a surprising new poll showing Udall at 45 and Shaffer only five behind. Of course, the Dems and MSM are trumpeting that as evidence Shaffer is already toast, but that's wrong.

I was to be honest shocked and pleased Shaffer's only five behind, basically within the percentage of error. Udall has a huge war chest and better name recognition because Shaffer left Congress several terms ago and his district is mostly outside the metro area.

Shaffer also reportedly has turned on the afterburners and raised around $700K already. All in all, I'm very encouraged.

19 posted on 09/11/2007 10:48:58 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson