Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slew of bills face deadline - Some measures passed, such as microstamping bullets to ID crime guns
Sacramento Bee ^ | 9/11/7 | Jim Sanders

Posted on 09/11/2007 8:00:55 AM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2007 8:00:59 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“The microstamping measure, Assembly Bill 1471, would make California the first state to require makers of new models of semiautomatic pistols, after January 2010, to etch the gun make, model and serial number on each cartridge fired.”

And California surges into the lead in the race to Stupid...

TC


2 posted on 09/11/2007 8:02:31 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Microstamping bullets? Stupid idea.


3 posted on 09/11/2007 8:04:26 AM PDT by Leg Olam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy123

I remember reading on here that it’s an ineffective and quite expensive thing to do.


4 posted on 09/11/2007 8:07:26 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy123
Actually, it’s not stupid at all...it’s a brilliant way to PREVENT manufactures from selling ANY ammo in CA, there by using laws to limit trade on Ammo to circumvent the 2nd amendment....sneaky, slimy snakes these left wingers.
5 posted on 09/11/2007 8:08:28 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

Somebody was watching Judge Dredd and forgot that it’s science fiction.


6 posted on 09/11/2007 8:08:51 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Also...

[California]Senate approves bill to 'microstamp' pistol cartridges
7 posted on 09/11/2007 8:10:00 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This would be a great way to get away with murder in CA. Use a faked or false # on shells you spread around after catching the ones used to kill someone.

You can take out 2 enemies at once that way. The framed one and the one you kill.

Liberal thinking at its finest there.


8 posted on 09/11/2007 8:12:27 AM PDT by Tolsti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I wonder if this can be challenged in Federal Court as a state-imposed impediment to interstate trade under the Commerce Clause? Constitutional lawyers please sound off.


9 posted on 09/11/2007 8:16:04 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

People still use revolvers.


10 posted on 09/11/2007 8:16:50 AM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

For clarification, the ammo isn’t pre-stamped. The firearm itself creates the microstamp when fired, thus littering your favorite range with forensic evidence pointing to you, and free for the taking.


11 posted on 09/11/2007 8:21:18 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

It won’t do a thing to gun owners such as myself that either do their own reloading or primarily favor black powder firearms.


12 posted on 09/11/2007 8:22:34 AM PDT by Leg Olam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This bill has only one intent and that is to prohibit lawfull persons from buying semi-auto handguns.

Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.


13 posted on 09/11/2007 8:27:49 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
What is to prevent people from replacing or filing down the firing pins, or criminals from collecting brass casings fired by others and dropping them at the scene of a crime, or from using weapons purchased in other states? More laws....of, course.

Want to reduce crime? Then punish the people who commit them ! But no, apparently California's legislators want to continue providing criminals with greater legal protection than their victims.

14 posted on 09/11/2007 8:28:53 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck
And California surges into the lead in the race to Stupid...

You ain't kiddin'. I suppose that this means that these data must be stamped in the brass casing when the shell is discharged, but what of it? The casing is not what hits the target anyway, and you're never going to be able to tag the bullet like that, nor connect it reliably with any particular fired shell casing. Assuming that the shooter didn't bother to collect his brass afterwards, just before helpfully planting some which would implicate somebody else.

As another poster pointed out, this is not about solving crimes, it's about putting an undue burden on the manufacture of weapons, as an end run around the Second Amendment.

15 posted on 09/11/2007 8:28:56 AM PDT by thulldud (Millete adi politikacilar gibi yalanci vaadlerde bulunmaktan nefret ederiz. -- (Ataturk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud

It’s called a brass-catcher.


16 posted on 09/11/2007 8:30:22 AM PDT by DirtyPigpen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. When there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”


17 posted on 09/11/2007 8:34:28 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (All my bullets are dipped in PIG fat. How about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
The firearm itself creates the microstamp when fired, thus littering your favorite range with forensic evidence pointing to you,

Now you have it. Betcha ten bucks there will be "exempt" firearms for "law enforcement only." No way they should have to obey the law of mere commoners...

Jail is too good for those responsible. They are infringing Citizens 2nd A. right via terroristic undertones. Of course, it being mexifornia it will not be long before anyone there will miss the Rights of American Citizenship. There will not be anyone left that actually knew what they were or had them to begin with.

18 posted on 09/11/2007 8:42:26 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Atlas does need to shrug more frequently.


19 posted on 09/11/2007 8:44:47 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

LEO guns, however, would be EXEMPT from this requirement! What an OUTRAGE!!!


20 posted on 09/11/2007 8:53:49 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson