Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The desert tank duel that wasn`t
Business Standard,India ^ | September 11, 2007 | Ajai Shukla

Posted on 09/10/2007 10:13:38 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

The T-90S

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
The Arjun

1 posted on 09/10/2007 10:13:46 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

2,250 crore India rupees is roughly equal to 500 million USD.


2 posted on 09/10/2007 10:18:05 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The real reason for cancelling the trials is that if, in head-to-head trials, the Arjun proved to be the better tank, there was no way the project could be buried with an order of only 124 tanks. Instead, the army’s entire tank procurement programme would need to be reworked;
***I see that ridiculous decisions are not the sole property of the US armed services. Some tinhorn bureaucrats don’t want a superior, domestic weapons program because they would have too much paperwork.


3 posted on 09/10/2007 10:22:09 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

The Indian army does have some valid reasons to be hesitant about the Arjun other than an unwillingness to change & the all pervasive influence of the pro-Russian lobby.

1.The Arjun has a 4 man crew compared to the3 on the existing T-72 & 90 tanks.That means changing your manning & training procedures on a pretty large scale.

2.They use different engines-so difficult maintainance.

3.The Arjun uses a 120 mm rifled bore gun-the Russian tanks use a 125 mm smooth bore gun.So two different sets of ammo.

4.The Arjun is too big to be transported on the Army existing rail cars,which were developed for the Russian tanks or be carried on the IL-76 aircraft.So it would have difficulty deploying unless the army comes up with something different.


4 posted on 09/10/2007 10:31:25 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And look at the sides of the turret! Straight up-and-down, instead of sharply sloped like most other tanks. I’d guess it’s vulnerable to armour-piercing rounds. although I know nothing about the Arjun’s design.


5 posted on 09/10/2007 10:47:59 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( Support global warming ... we midwesterners need a coastline too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Looks like India is outsourcing it’s tank production.(:-)


6 posted on 09/10/2007 10:51:56 PM PDT by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
It looks like an older German Leopard II tank.


7 posted on 09/10/2007 11:34:23 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The Arjun started off with German assistance-some refer to it as the Leopard-I(I for India).


8 posted on 09/10/2007 11:35:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It looks like it.


9 posted on 09/10/2007 11:38:26 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I had thought that the Arjun had been canceled. I was surprised that they were still planning to buy a couple of hundred of them.


10 posted on 09/11/2007 7:48:45 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is there any chance we would be getting this tanks. If this is actually superior to the T-90 then the only way for this tank to go is to be part of the Indian Army inventory (for many good reasons).

What do you think are the chances for this tank?


11 posted on 09/11/2007 8:50:59 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is there any chance we would be getting this tanks. If this is actually superior to the T-90 then the only way for this tank to go is to be part of the Indian Army inventory (for many good reasons).

What do you think are the chances for this tank?


12 posted on 09/11/2007 8:51:06 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is the T90) an evolution upgrade for the T80?

IIRC a Bushmaster 25mm shell will take out a T80 most every time.....


13 posted on 09/11/2007 8:56:06 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Vladimir Putin is deeply saddened


14 posted on 09/11/2007 8:57:37 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Hillary's color is yellow.....how appropriate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35; Gengis Khan

Nope-it’s very unlikely that the Arjun will be cancelled.Too much money has been invested & any government which tries to pull the plug will land in hot water.What will probably happen is that the government & army will go down the middle path-order a few more batches of Arjun tanks in addition to the existing order for 124.This looks possible as the Indian defence minister declared in Parliament a week or so ago that French & German experts were helping in correcting defects in it & more upgrades come along.It’s likely that ‘Hi-Lo’ strategy will be evolved for having a small number of Arjun tanks (less than a 1000) along with a larger number of T-72/90 tanks.


15 posted on 09/11/2007 8:59:49 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Nope,the T-90 is a beefed up T-72 with better protection,electronics & weaponry.The T-80 was too expensive to produce in mass numbers due to it’s gas turbine propulsion.

About the Bushmaster,well when did it take out a T-80??The tank has hardly seen any combat.


16 posted on 09/11/2007 9:01:34 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

The Arjun is better than the T-90 for the same reasons that Western tanks like the Abrams & Leopard-2 are better than Russian ones.You cannot cram the T-90 beyond a point.The Arjun won’t be procured in large numbers-it’s more expensive(almost twice as much as the T-90) & you would need to make massive infrastructure changes to accomodate it.Don’t think the Army is prepared for that.


17 posted on 09/11/2007 9:05:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thank you - musta been T72s then, saw photos (from son) of T series tank he said had been taken out by Bushmaster/Bradley.

Was wondering if T90 was as weak on flank/rear.

Will look further on web.


18 posted on 09/11/2007 9:11:52 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan; ASOC

Interesting trivia about the Arjun-

The original project drawn up in the 70s was for a 40 ton tank with a 105 mm gun.This was changed in the 80s to the current configuration given that the Pakis were evaluating the Abrams M1A1.Zia Ul Haq,along with the then American ambassador to Pakistan were killed in an air crash in 1988,after both witnessed an Abrams demo.


19 posted on 09/11/2007 9:12:14 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Likely to be T-72.The T-80s were not exported till after the 1st Gulf war.


20 posted on 09/11/2007 9:13:12 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson