Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Companies linking health factors to benefits (First tehy came for the smokers....)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20625381/ ^ | 9-9-07

Posted on 09/10/2007 5:46:53 AM PDT by Hydroshock

CINCINNATI - First they tried nudging. Now companies are penalizing workers who have high health risks such as obesity and high blood pressure or cholesterol as insurance costs climb.

Lee Morrison, 51, doesn’t mind the push, which came in the form of added insurance charges from his employer, Western & Southern Financial Group.

“I knew if I wanted to be healthier and pay less, it was up to me to do something about it,” said Morrison, who has lost 54 pounds and lowered his body mass index enough to earn refunds the past two years.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Hydroshock

I’m sure there will be lawsuits.

The problem is, the medical community keeps lowering the bar for blood pressure and cholesterol numbers, so that more and more people fall into the *high* category, who were OK before.

They’ll eventually just set the standard so low that NO ONE will be able to comply, we’ll all be *needing* medication to get the numbers down, and penalized if they don’t comply.

Nice gravy train for the pharm companies.


21 posted on 09/10/2007 6:55:45 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

You got it. There are multitudes of behaviors and habits that could be considered “health risks”.

This is the danger of this idea. Even those not participating in supposed health risks can become ill too.

How about cell phone risks, riding motorcycles, climbing rocks, vegetarianism, dieters that take pills etc.


22 posted on 09/10/2007 6:59:04 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Coffee has many healthful anti-oxidents in it and may reduce the risk of cancer.


23 posted on 09/10/2007 7:06:25 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: farlander

When they go after homosexuals....get back with me.


24 posted on 09/10/2007 7:08:42 AM PDT by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan

Considering how universal coffee drinking is, I’m sure that will trump any negative effects. Besides, rob coffee drinkers of their coffee in the morning and things get ugly. I’ve seen what friends go through without their morning fix.


25 posted on 09/10/2007 7:10:29 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

“Try proposing that sex deviates or drug users paying more and you’ll be charged with a “hate crime” !”

A large percentage of these companies already test for drugs. I you’re using illegal drugs they don’t raise your premium, they fire you.


26 posted on 09/10/2007 7:13:07 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: metmom

And if that caffeine is having detrimental health effects then it would make some sense as in the context of this thread. But keep in mind, the insurance companies aren’t “going after” cigarettes, they are going after people unhealthy because of cigarettes. Those people can continue to smoke if they so choose.


27 posted on 09/10/2007 7:15:07 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Skiers, Rock Climbers, Off-Roaders, Shooters, and all the rest: Get ready.

If your recreational habits extend farther than time in the gym (Mandatory time in the gym) or sedate walking and bird watching (in approved safe areas), look out, that list will get longer...

28 posted on 09/10/2007 7:15:42 AM PDT by kAcknor (Don't flatter yourself.... It is a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
"Now all we need are some politicians (beginning with our current president) to show some guts and determination and start flogging this to the public at every opportunity."

LOL! Let's not hold our breaths.

Carolyn

29 posted on 09/10/2007 7:16:23 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I can see lawsuits demanding what the justification for these seemingly arbitrary surcharges is. If they can’t substantiate it then its discrimination.


30 posted on 09/10/2007 7:17:21 AM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor

“Skiers, Rock Climbers, Off-Roaders, Shooters, and all the rest: Get ready.”

If you try to buy medical or life insurance privately, items like this (not sure about these exact ones) are already taken into account. Why shouldn’t they be when it’s employer provided?


31 posted on 09/10/2007 7:21:01 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

How do they test for AIDS or sex deviancy?


32 posted on 09/10/2007 8:15:08 AM PDT by traditional1 ( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor

You posted:Skiers, Rock Climbers, Off-Roaders, Shooters, and all the rest: Get ready.
If your recreational habits extend farther than time in the gym (Mandatory time in the gym) or sedate walking and bird watching (in approved safe areas), look out, that list will get longer...
***

Insurance of all kinds should be de-linked to employment. What started out as a benefit offered by some employers has come to be considered a right by employees. That should never have happened. Stop the group plans, give the employee the money employers now pay for insurance and let them decide whether and how much insurance to buy for themselves. Perhaps even consider requiring the purchase of insurance as we do for car insurance.

As for the amount of premiums, insurance companies use actuarial tables to determine risk and length of life applying various factors. Let the market control premiums based upon these factors. Perhaps there are insurance companies who do not feel as though smoking or obesity creates any additional risk. Smokers and the obese should get their insurance through those companies.


33 posted on 09/10/2007 8:29:49 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Ford4000
I’m sure there will be lawsuits.

I am sure you are right.

Consider that employers are not allowed to use any screening test for employment that has a "disparate impact" on women and minorities [adversely affecting their chance of being hired] unless they can demonstrate that it is absolutely necessary to do so.

It's not exactly a secret that more women and minorities (Asians excepted) have problems with weight control. So this penalty for excess weight has a disparate impact on them. Far more blacks have blood pressure problems than other groups. Again, disparate impact. And some minority groups smoke more than whites.

Once the lawyers figure this out, they are going to have a field day. Even if the courts won't extend the disparate impact concept to health insurance, lawyers will embarrass companies into stopping a program that they will claim targets the lowest paid workers.

34 posted on 09/10/2007 8:35:30 AM PDT by freespirited (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop. -- P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I’ve read plenty of literature that demonstrates that most non-white people groups do NOT deal with the white flour white sugar Western diet very well. They tend to have real problems like obesity and diabetes when going on they typical American diet. For some American Indian tribes,the diabetes rate is about 40%.


35 posted on 09/10/2007 8:40:21 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kAcknor

What is not mandatory is prohibited.


36 posted on 09/10/2007 8:40:29 AM PDT by ichabod1 ("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Well, all I have to say is that if they pull this with my health insurance it’s time to talk to a lawyer regarding health threats of homosexuality versus smoking.


37 posted on 09/10/2007 8:43:41 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farlander

You’re not paying for anyone’s unhealthy habits any more than you are paying for their hangnails or their missed day of work because the electricity went out.

The greatest burden on the health care system is the fascination with all their marvelous toys, their burdensome layers of bureaucracy and the overbuiding of facilities in the most desirable places to die.


38 posted on 09/10/2007 8:49:02 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Building, my “l” key eludes me.


39 posted on 09/10/2007 8:50:09 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

The solution is to sever the link between employment and benefits.

Pay me my whole salary in cash and let me buy my healthcare and fund my retirement on pre-tax dollars.


40 posted on 09/10/2007 8:53:22 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (To libs killing a windfarm is bad, letting a gal die in your Oldsmobile is not so bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson