Is this front page in the U.S. papers? Is it leading the nightly news? And is the Clinton connection being front-loaded or buried?
There can be plenty of Saturday edition, inside articles, but I have not and will not see the kind of hysterical drum beat I see with Republican scandals.
Just ask your self what the coverage would be like for a similar criminal connection to President Bush when he was a candidate?
And yes, all it will take is one Republican haven taken two cents fron this guy and that will be the headline news. It will morph into a “general corruption” scandal, highlighting the need for “change” [read:elect Democrats].
It was on the front page for a day on many papers or certainly in the first few papers. I think its getting about the right coverage. Part of the problem is the Peter Paul hysteria in some circles has not helped - its been a but of boy cries wolf situation. now that there is something documentably real it will take more to escalate it to very serious. Right now its a crooked fund raiser who gave money to Dems.