Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monomaniac
Evolution Must be Taught in Science Class; Creation only for Religion Classes

Well of course. What's the problem with that?

The theory of evolution is a branch of science, while creationism is pure religion. And everybody knows it!

2 posted on 09/09/2007 8:52:40 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Next thing you know, they’ll be calling for math to be taught in math class, and English in English class.


3 posted on 09/09/2007 8:54:14 PM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

Coyoteman, pulling the night shift for the voice of reason. Good on ya man. I don’t believe the world is 6,500 years old but I don’t have the energy to argue once the literalists get on this thread. You’ll be up all night. Good night!


4 posted on 09/09/2007 9:13:46 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

I think everybody whose read anything on the topic “knows” evolution is a theory, not a fact. I want my children to hear all theories, not just the secular progressive’s theory.


5 posted on 09/09/2007 9:16:17 PM PDT by TraditionalistMommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

I like your tag line.


11 posted on 09/09/2007 11:14:32 PM PDT by Timbo64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman; monomaniac; coloradan; TraditionalistMommy; TenthAmendmentChampion; spyone
"The theory of evolution is a branch of science, while creationism is pure religion. And everybody knows it!"

Everyone also knows that the theory of evolution and science are based on the philosophy of naturalism with the following assumption that naturalism is then the ultimate arbiter of truth.

Or maybe not...

But no naturalist wants 'everyone' to know that or they wouldn't constantly pretend that the philosophical foundation of naturalism followed by the assumption that naturalism is then the ultimate arbiter of truth isn't an exercise in circular reasoning for 'science'.

19 posted on 09/11/2007 8:49:13 AM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
The real issue to conservatives should not be the usual evo vs. creo fight, but the danger to the autonomy of private schools when they accept government money. If you take the state’s dime, you will have to dance to the state’s tune. Today it is the nature of creation in Ontario, tomorrow it will be Christian doctrine on homosexuality and abortion, and the day after the teaching of the glories of diversity and multiculturalism. This fact should discourage anyone who wants government vouchers for students to attend private schools.
22 posted on 09/11/2007 9:29:27 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Well of course. What's the problem with that?

The problem is this quote from the so-called 'conservative' leader: "The Christian-based school would have to teach the Ontario curriculum"

In other words, private Christian schools would have to teach the same curriculum as the Ontario public schools. Not exactly a conservative position.

26 posted on 09/11/2007 9:49:31 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
The theory of evolution is a branch of science

It is a branch of fiction and should be taught in literature.

44 posted on 09/11/2007 2:50:00 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson