Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo
Sorry but Bush has always demanded multilateral negotiations with NK and has always been reviled for doing so in the liberal press. His reasons for demanding multilateral negotiations and NK’s reasons for avoiding them are the ones I’ve mentioned before. This is a diplomatic coup for the US. Unlike under all past presidencies during the past 3 decades, if Kimmy boy backs away from this one, he will have to deal with not only the US, but China, and Russia.
26 posted on 09/09/2007 10:20:06 PM PDT by Delacon (When in doubt, ask a liberal and do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Delacon

Please face it. We were esssentially and eventually blackmailed.

The fact is, Bush maintained the multilateral approach as you correctly point out, and refused, initially and to his credit quite stubbornly, to take the bait and to engage in direct US/DPRK talks and negotiations--as the Democrats insisted.

This was during his correct, purist earlier phase of foreign policy on this issue bypassing the State Department traditional approach of appeasement, detente, and "carrots over sticks".

As I said, the Libs and Clintonites urged him into one-on-one with DPRK as well. He resisted for as long as he could.

And this is where you and I start to part ways in our interpretation. For example, dont you recall anything of that most embarrassing situation of the US scrambling laughingstock-wise to get the DPRK's massive illegal drug/conterfeit based cash back to them from Banco del Asia, almost tripping over their shoelaces shamelessly, all along the length of Foggy Bottom?

At the end of last year, Mr. Bush's position weakened considerably by Democrat control of Congress and other global distractions (Iraq to name a few), he did in fact change his tact and in fact did enter bilateral one-on-one discussions with the DPRK. By this, they had achieved their biggest victory in Pyongyang. They even had a major national celebration over their success. Ask Chris Hill. He did the negotiating. This is a stubborn, immovable fact.

In my opinion, indeed this was the low-water mark and showed the departure of the Bush Administration from its earlier correct line of strength and pressure (including efforts to strangle the regime) to one of more conciliation and appeasement. Why do you think all of the world's major, mainline appeasement press, Time, Newsweek, Economist, NYTimes, WashPost, came out in editorals and writing and said essentially "FINALLY! He vanquished the neocons and has come around to our way of thinking on this regarding engagement of Pyongyang rather than isolation". When the world press went in favor of Bush's altered strategy, I dont know about you, but that told me a lot.

It is the fact of the matter. To insist otherwise, one must have been living on another planet for the last 12 months.

This is no victory. We should not trumpet it as one.

28 posted on 09/09/2007 11:02:13 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time, an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson