Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: john drake
The tax excuse doesn't explain it. Most people seem to use their discretionary assets on themselves, not for having children. How often have you heard of people taking out a 2nd mortgage so they can have more kids as opposed to all the other stuff?

There're plenty of wealthy couples to whom children present an unacceptable alteration of their preferred lifestyle. And we know where that came from too. When was the last time you saw raising babies and young children prominently featured in television and movies?

39 posted on 09/08/2007 8:33:39 AM PDT by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Justa

You are correct. A seismic shift in our society’s fundamental values is the primary culprit; superindividualism combined with maximum consumerism with an overdose of secular humanism does it every time. Probably the ugliest parts of a free society in the West. I wasn’t using the tax problem as the source, just a contributing factor. For those of us who wanted families and had them, this would’ve certainly come in handy in saving more income for their education; whether it was college or trade school, depending on their skill sets. Regardless, people taking out second mortgages to support their lifestyles on either expensive vacations, etc. or depreciating assets is an incredibly stupid thing to do. They will pay for it, now or in the near future. Or, I suppose we’ll end up paying higher taxes as the government bails them out. We live in sick times.


92 posted on 09/08/2007 2:23:57 PM PDT by john drake (Roman military maxim; "oderint dum metuant," i.e., "let them hate, as long as they fear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson