Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress upset at late-night decision on Mexican trucks
Houston Chronicle/AP ^ | Sept. 7, 2007 | SUZANNE GAMBOA

Posted on 09/07/2007 2:56:27 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration's late-night decision allowing Mexican trucks to ply U.S. roads triggered angry criticism Friday from opponents of the trucking program.

John Hill, head of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, gave the go-ahead for the trucks late Thursday night, allowing Transportes Olympic of Nuevo Leon, Mexico, to drive its trucks beyond the roughly 25-mile limit from the border where they have been confined.

In return, Mexico granted permission to Stagecoach Cartage in El Paso to operate in Mexico.

Neither company had crossed the border yet, and Hill said the trucks might begin crossing this weekend.

The announcement was made in a news release and conference call with reporters around 9 p.m. EDT Thursday. The announcement had been expected earlier in the week.

"It was done in the dark of the night with very little notice," said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., who sponsored legislation for the pilot program under certain safety criteria.

The pilot program is restricted to 100 Mexican carriers who are allowed to cross a total 1,000 vehicles.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., said he would offer an amendment similar to Fazio's when the Senate takes up the transportation spending bill, probably next week.

"I think they are exhibiting an arrogance that is pretty unbelievable," Dorgan said of the administration. "They've given short shrift to all objections, rushing to allow Mexican long haul trucks into this country."

But Hill said the program should be given a chance to run because every Mexican truck has to meet the same standard as U.S. trucks.

"Every time we get close to fulfilling requirements for what Congress told us to do originally with implementation of NAFTA, there seems to be additional requirements put on to this program," he said.

Before the announcement could be made, the transportation department inspector general and the transportation secretary had to make reports to Congress on safety and other requirements.

The inspector general's report was issued about 7:30 p.m. Thursday.

"The DOT waited less than an hour to implement their plan," Dorgan said.

"The inspector general is the one who controls this event. He chose to release his report at 7:30 p.m. After he releaed his, then we released ours. We did it as expeditiously and responsibly as we could," Hill said.

The 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, promised access to all U.S. highways by 2000 to Mexican and Canadian truckers.

Canadian trucking companies already have full access to U.S. roads, but Mexican trucks can travel only about 25 miles inside the country, or 75 miles in Arizona.

Lawsuits and opposition by labor and safety groups have stalled the opening of roads to Mexican trucks.

The inspector general's report to Congres said the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Association had made progress in addressing Congress' requirements.

But it also said the administration had no coordinated plans for checking trucks and drivers participating in the test program, and that the motor carrier safety group needed to do more to help enforce the English requirements for drivers.

Five states told the inspector general's office they were not ready to enforce the safety rules for the trucks during the pilot project. Twenty-six states raised one or more concerns.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration made some adjustments in response to the report.

Fazio said he still worries that Mexico does not have a certified drug testing facility or limits on driving times.

The Teamsters sued to stop the pilot program. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association asked the U.S. appeals court in Washington Friday to suspend the program pending a review of it by the court.

Clayton Boyce, vice president of public affairs for the American Trucking Association, said the group has grave concerns of how the pilot project would be carried out and whether it would be safe, even though they supported NAFTA.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 110th; bush; congress; mexicantrucks; truckers; trucking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: sergeantdave
civics lesson
The FMCSA is a "regulatory agency," meaning that it acts on the authority (and under the oversight) of Congress.
/civics lesson
21 posted on 09/07/2007 4:03:32 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: call meVeronica; AnimalLover; rineaux; Roamin53; genxer; time4good; NoTaxTexas; RGVTx; ...

Ping!

If you want on, or off this S. Texas/Mexico ping list, please FReepMail me.


22 posted on 09/07/2007 4:12:10 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

What a bunch of bull. Who was it who approved this treaty anyway? Congress. Now they’re mad because Bush is implementing it?


23 posted on 09/07/2007 4:48:16 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

TANKS...


24 posted on 09/07/2007 5:28:19 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Stop the New World (B)order!


25 posted on 09/07/2007 5:28:24 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

nice, rude one,
any sources to back it?


26 posted on 09/07/2007 5:32:40 PM PDT by Hornet19 (It's Time to Put Up or Shut Up...Where Do You Stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
The Bush administration's late-night decision allowing Mexican trucks to ply U.S. roads triggered angry criticism Friday from opponents of the trucking program.


27 posted on 09/07/2007 5:34:06 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

NAFTA is NOT a treaty...it is an agreement. If Congress had half a brain and a quarter of a spine it could be scrapped tommorow...and should be.


28 posted on 09/07/2007 5:35:49 PM PDT by Hornet19 (It's Time to Put Up or Shut Up...Where Do You Stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
The 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, promised access to all U.S. highways by 2000 to Mexican and Canadian truckers.

What President authorized this piece of crap?

Bill Clinton but he got it through Congress due to all the Republicans who voted for it. Democrats voted against it

29 posted on 09/07/2007 5:36:13 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hornet19

tommorow = tomorrow. sorry, long week.


30 posted on 09/07/2007 5:37:17 PM PDT by Hornet19 (It's Time to Put Up or Shut Up...Where Do You Stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thanks. Who authored it? I’d like to know who is (beside GW) who has been pushing this crap for over a decade. It might help to know in the upcoming battle for our sovereignty.


31 posted on 09/07/2007 5:44:53 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Mexican vehicles are notorious for being unsafe. Will many Americans need to die on the highways before they are prohibited?


32 posted on 09/07/2007 5:49:31 PM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

Ping - NAFTA


33 posted on 09/07/2007 5:54:59 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Please add me to your ping list, bcsco.


34 posted on 09/07/2007 5:56:11 PM PDT by janetgreen (AMERICA FOR SALE - Call GWBush at 202-456-1414)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

“Democrats voted against it”

Wow, didn’t remember that. Guess the Democrats get it right every now and then. Bravo to them for that effort.


35 posted on 09/07/2007 5:57:20 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

If you look at the link to Reagan, there is NO mention of Mexico, only Canada.


36 posted on 09/07/2007 6:06:43 PM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don
Will many Americans need to die on the highways before they are prohibited?

It will indeed, take dead children, lots of them, before it happens. It's just like a dangerous intersection, a certain number of people have to die before they put up a traffic signal.

37 posted on 09/07/2007 6:09:33 PM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
Daddy Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts started this mess, "encouraged" by the then-Mexican president. Daddy had his vision of the New World Order, and we all know how that is turning out for American citizens/taxpayers. His puppet son is pushing it to the limits.

http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0401/article_298.shtml

38 posted on 09/07/2007 6:23:42 PM PDT by janetgreen (AMERICA FOR SALE - Call GWBush at 202-456-1414)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Daddy Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts started this mess

bttt!

39 posted on 09/07/2007 6:28:07 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"Who was it who approved this treaty anyway? Congress. Now they’re mad because Bush is implementing it?"

NAFTA is not a treaty, and it was never approved by Congress. Treaties must be ratified by Congress, and since this never was, anything having to do with NAFTA is illegal in my book.

40 posted on 09/07/2007 6:31:48 PM PDT by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson