Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: looscnnn
Mormons celebrate the Sabbath on Sunday. Other Christians were freed from the bondage of Sabbath on Sat. But enough talk about religion.

Lawsuit? I changed nothing. You said you were going to research it. Apparently you've done nothing. Must I teach you EVERYTHING?

I provided you with Zelman's words, in essence. He stated the Simkin lawsuit would perhaps tear JPFO asunder. That's not a quote. But close enough. It should take you all of 2 minutes to read it if you were interested. Obviously you aren't.

You want me to provide you quotes of what you've said? Are you the suicidal dyslexic twin who killed his brother by accident?

If you are going to post an article here on FR, fine. If you are going to use it as a basis to attack another group? Fine. But be ready to back it up. To that end, you've failed, and failed miserably. Stop talking and start reading. The basis for your anti-NRA/Jackson tirade is a document from JPFO. When you defend the article, you defend them. I simply pointed out they(JPFO) are not without fault and you lost your water, if not your mud.

I apologize for any spelling errors. Trying to watch football while amusing myself on my laptop....

330 posted on 09/09/2007 7:00:32 PM PDT by donozark (Restraining orders are just another way of saying I love you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: donozark

Being freed to observe Sunday as the holy day does not make it the Sabbath.

I said I would research the rabbi incident as you asked about that. Completely different that Simkin’s lawsuit.

“The basis for your anti-NRA/Jackson tirade”

Where have I been anti-NRA, where have I said do not join the NRA? Just because I took them to task for things they have done does not make me anti-NRA. If you think that you are the “suicidal dyslexic twin”. That would make you no different than the pro-amnesty crowd because being against amnesty makes you a racist.

Being anti-Jackson, fair enough I will agree to that. Why am I? Because this is a person that should know better. Having sworn to protect the Constitution, he should not said any of those things in the interview or in the response.

So tell me, where is the article wrong? The words came out of his mouth and no matter what he says in his “response” the article is not incorrect.

I have never claimed that any group is perfect, as I have stated previously. Neither is the NRA so does that mean that lost your water/mud?

Stop being a NRA-bot and start thinking for yourself.

I am watching football and typing on the laptop also, but I’m not having that problem.


333 posted on 09/09/2007 7:16:14 PM PDT by looscnnn (DU is a VD for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson