Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donozark

I have been a member off and on but am not presently as I am not very happy with them at all.

As to the changes, don’t you think that it is just plain common sense to have a provision to remove someone who is detrimental to the group’s effort?

My local group set up our by laws that way so we could never be taken over by anyone hostile to our goals and objectives and we didn’t need high priced lawyers and millions of dollars to do it.

And yes, our group has been very effective in stopping anti gun legislation in the State even when we had to overcome the NRA’s efforts to push bad legislation.

And no, there is not one paid person in our group. It is an all volunteer effort. Sometimes I think that those getting paid don’t really want to solve the problem because it would mean the end to their big paychecks and perks.


215 posted on 09/08/2007 2:59:18 PM PDT by Harvey105 (Go ahead kid. Keep the screwdriver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: Harvey105
It is an all volunteer effort. Sometimes I think that those getting paid don’t really want to solve the problem because it would mean the end to their big paychecks and perks.

Ding...Ding...Ding. We have a winner! Somewhere up the thread I likened it to Je$$e Jackass and the race issue.

216 posted on 09/08/2007 3:12:22 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

To: Harvey105
It works both ways. NRA is a very large, complex org. I don't think we'd want such a powerful org. to have the ability to kick people out assigned to one individual nor a small group of individuals. The concentration of so much power given to one person or one small group is risky at best. Dangerous at worse.

I neither agree, nor disagree with you. I personally favor a "Board of Governors" as opposed to a Board of Directors. 50 plus one "at large." One from each state. This way members could become acquainted with "their" Governor, instead of 75 plus one at large Directors scattered all about the country.

It may take NRA longer to accomplish this "expulsion," but if it is done it will be done in accordance with members views and not by a select few.

218 posted on 09/08/2007 3:23:22 PM PDT by donozark (Restraining orders are just another way of saying I love you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

To: Harvey105
Now you're telling us that you're not even an NRA member?

We went through that whole discussion that you started with me, and you're not an NRA member?

This whole issue doesn't even apply to you.

226 posted on 09/08/2007 5:33:52 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson