Replies

First, I don't understand why you are acting as if I didn't answer your question. I not only answered it, I gave you two answers that both apply. If you want to say I'm wrong, then that's great, but if you're going to act like I'm dodging you this conversation will be over faster than an Air Supply concert at Ozfest.

Then there's this:

Which you stated those being imported are no threat to us).

You apparently cannot read. I specifically said otherwise. Here it is again, slightly edited, and with the passage you couldn't read bolded:

And if they are capable of destroying and conquering America, why does our current administration continue to allow into our country, tens of thousands of Muslims routinely and legally?
Both of the following answers are correct:
1. Because they underestimate the threat from [newly] resident Muslims because the vast, vast majority of domestic Muslims [long-term immigrant and native-born] have no interest in killing the infidel; they came to America to escape that crap.
2. They believe (correctly, thus far) that their security methods are working very well in preventing attacks.

Now, unless you're blind or illiterate, you've had that answer, and you can see it has nothing in it that says there is no threat from Muslim immigrants.

Your question is what do we do with American citizens, that were born and raised here? Are they a problem? I don't think so. Maybe there are a few nuts between them, but do you think these few native American citizens that happen to be Muslims are actually capable of destroying and conquering America?

I don't think it's likely, no. And I do think American Muslims are for the most part quite different from Muslims in other Western countries. For example, the Philadelphia Inquirer ran the Muhammad cartoons, and while newspapers in Europe had received violence and death threats the Inquirer got peacefully picketed by 11 American Muslims.

Consider this: Christianity is absolutely, positively NOT the Religion of Anal Sex. Yet there are people claiming to be Christians (indeed, who believe they are Christiands just as surely as I believe I am one) who will tell you that Jesus blessed a male gay couple in their relationship and that we are only His followers if we support homosexual conduct.

Well, I believe that Islam is absolutely, positively NOT the Religion of Peace. Yet the vast majority of Muslims (and almost all American Muslims) have no interest in killing infidels for Islam.

So, if I were trying to keep people out of my country that would campaign for gay marriage, should I exclude all Christians, or should I try to determine which ones think Jesus gave the thumbs up to people having gay sex? You seem to have a problem with the administration letting Muslims into the country. Well, they've decided to try and exclude the jihadists without excluding people who are much like American Muslims. Is that a good idea? Well, we've gone six years without a major attack.

Me, I'd prefer Victor Davis Hanson's strategy where we revive the Cold War immigration restrictions for the Communist bloc and apply them to Muslim states, but then we would have to keep the same scrutiny methods now in place for immigrants from places like Germany, Britain and Holland.

I have now answered your questions and even elaborated beyond them. Now it's your turn. What do you believe are the answers to your two questions, and what do you think we should have as a policy in those areas?