Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

“A professional would have...”

Done just what he did. Assuming there’s something to this, they’d have wanted Willey to know exactly why they were in there so she’d be afraid, as she no doubt is. Who wouldn’t be? The “list” of the dearly departed is very long.
The Clintons? They have every reason to believe they’re untouchable because they always have been. The MSM sees to that. They are evil people, both of them.


46 posted on 09/06/2007 9:06:34 AM PDT by beelzepug ("One should never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: beelzepug
Done just what he did.

Not in a million years.

If a professional wanted to scare her, all he would have to do is slip silently into her home and take her manuscript and her hard drive - and perhaps cut her phone lines from inside the house.

That would scare anyone - knowing that you had been so silently and neatly targeted by someone who left behind no hard evidence that you could use to prove he was there.

The whole point of psychological intimidation is to make the person you are targeting feel completely isolated and unable to prove that he is being targeted.

The incident description looks like someone clumsily doing something to themselves: a big mess in which only one item of any value is taken and it is an item which the victim should have multiple copies of and which is theoretically being published quite soon and could use some buzz/

49 posted on 09/06/2007 9:15:45 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson