What if the purpose was not to suppress the book but to find out its contents, instead. If the Clintons know ahead of time what will be revealed they can execute a preemptive denial campaign or be ready with plausible deniability when the book does come out.
Sorry, but this reeks of "publicity stunt". (And being published in WingNutDaily doesn't help with that impression.) Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post): I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition. Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts. In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Kathleen Willey: Clintons stole my manuscript, varon wrote: OK, boys and girls, what's wrong with this picture, if one assumes that the intruder's goal was to suppress the manuscript? What if the purpose was not to suppress the book but to find out its contents, instead. If the Clintons know ahead of time what will be revealed they can execute a preemptive denial campaign or be ready with plausible deniability when the book does come out. Posting HTML This forum allows optional use of most HTML tags. If your post does not contain HTML, it will be converted to HTML when posted, retaining paragraphs as typed. This conversion is not performed if you have anything resembling an HTML tag in your text.
Exactly right....its the bimbo brigade alert plan still in effect. Know precisely the accusations that are coming and where and how they will service. Discredit them and the accuser before the are ever brought to the table. Get the media then to ignore the material [call it old news and ground already covered (by the Clintons that is)] when it does surface.
Your suggestion sounds most likely. A) To see a copy of the manu to see what she knows (and maybe have something “happen” to the thug she has by now identified — I’d not buy any green bananas if I were him), and B) to give her a little more terror like last time.
It doesn’t say but I do hope she doesn’t live alone.
Some of you posting here (not you, varon) don’t seem to understand that she did not lose her only copy of the manuscript. Thus the thief was not trying to suppress it.
“What if the purpose was not to suppress the book but to find out its contents, instead. If the Clintons know ahead of time what will be revealed they can execute a preemptive denial campaign or be ready with plausible deniability when the book does come out.”
That’s exactly what I was thinking. They need to know what’s in the book before they can move on to Phase II. Whether to deny the allegations or set out to discredit and destroy Kathleen Willey and/or anyone named in the book that would cause a problem for Hillary. The 1990s all over again.