1 posted on
09/05/2007 8:51:36 PM PDT by
RDTF
To: RDTF
2 posted on
09/05/2007 8:56:04 PM PDT by
relee
('Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
To: RDTF
instead of complying with a judge's ruling that the site must be open to all residents, including those who might be illegal immigrants.A successful equal protection argument made by criminals? If so, there's a precedent!
To: RDTF
courts, and not legislators, might have the ultimate say And therein lies the major obstacle in dealing with this severe problem. Activist jurists that make law instead of ruling on the constitutionality of law(s). The courts should not have the ultimate say. At that point we become ruled rather than represented.
4 posted on
09/05/2007 9:05:08 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: RDTF
This young country overturned judicial tyranny once before in its history, adopting certain measures and tactics.
It will come to that AGAIN if they do not BACK OFF and stopping destroying our country, taking it right down the toilet with their sham, dictatorial rulings.
7 posted on
09/05/2007 11:04:08 PM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time, an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the US)
To: RDTF
How convenient, but the auto exerpt function cut off, and THIS little gem was left out:
Paraphrashing here: "They mayor said that Herndon can launch other tactics that it has in its arsenal, such as zoning and vehicular laws and regulations, to get to the same goals".
So take THAT! ACLU and liberal judges trying to thwart the will of the people in that little town and in towns and cities across the land.
And if the illegal aliens take to the streets again, the people of HERNDON should rise up and take matters in their own hands, and take back their community.
8 posted on
09/05/2007 11:10:30 PM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time, an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the US)
To: RDTF
At issue was an ordinance the council approved in 2005 as a legal companion to the day-laborer center, barring workers and motorists from striking deals for employment on the streets. The courts have generally required that communities barring public solicitation for work -- a form of speech -- must provide an alternative venue for that speech, such as a hiring site.I have to wonder if these activist judges also demand an alternate location for prostitutes to do their soliciting, since it's also a form of speech.
Maybe the Herndon Mayor and council should set up a "free speech zone" for the day laborers (oh, heck! make it for the prostitutes, too) to solicit work - on the right-of-way in front of the activist judge's house.
She shouldn't mind. Too much.
To: RDTF
It should have never been built in the first place. Taxpayers money flushed right down the toilet.
To: RDTF
Well, its about high damn time! Long overdue!
15 posted on
09/06/2007 5:13:21 AM PDT by
Convert from ECUSA
(Hunter and Tancredo in '08! La Raza - the PLO of the Western Hemisphere)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: RDTF
Do any legal residents use these facilities?
18 posted on
09/06/2007 12:03:54 PM PDT by
mbraynard
(FDT: Less Leadership Experience than any president in US history)
To: RDTF
GRRRRRRRREAT news! Thanks for posting.
19 posted on
09/06/2007 8:17:41 PM PDT by
PGalt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson