Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
How long do you want to keep this up?. The law is judging me to be guilty even though I have not committed a crime. If it were not there would be no need of a background check. Who gets to determine if a name shows up on the list?. Can a mean hateful ex- wife put her ex- husbands name on it?.

You have used the word Ridiculous at least twice. I agree with you.

103 posted on 09/06/2007 4:02:06 PM PDT by seemoAR (Absolute power corrupts absolutely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets; seemoAR
You're simply in denial.
Declaring a person incompetent to own "dangerous items" is clearly an infringement on life and liberty. --
Thus -- Due process must be used. -- Nothing less than a full jury trial, imo.

Spunk:
Still no substance, and you're repeating yourself.

Well, at least you didn't repeat "Ridiculous".

110 posted on 09/06/2007 4:26:41 PM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson