To: mnehrling
Paul is more concerned about the semantics of the commerce clause that may have been vaguely related to these bills than on actually voting to restrict abortions.And you think the end justifies the means.
65 posted on
09/05/2007 5:33:11 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
I believe that saving life is more important than parsing words, that is not the ends justifying the means. That is weighing the importance of what side you take. If you think that vague references to the commerce clause that may or may not apply to a bill is more important than voting pro-life, so be it.
68 posted on
09/05/2007 5:35:22 PM PDT by
mnehring
(Cox/Craig 2008! Don't stall!!! (At least it makes more sense than Ron Paul.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson