To: G8 Diplomat
Well, OK. I don’t much care what folks in Massachussets think constitutes morality and I certainly don’t want them having a say in what we think is proper in Indiana. The fact is that federalizing morality has led to the wholesale legal slaughter of unborn children.
To: Mr. Lucky
The fact is that federalizing morality has led to the wholesale legal slaughter of unborn children.
True, in that case. But in this case it can lead to a ban on all gay unions.
I can see both sides of this coin, and everybody has their own opinon on which side is better.
64 posted on
09/05/2007 5:32:20 PM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(It's campaign season. Let's rumble!)
To: Mr. Lucky
EXACTLY! This goes right to my point about the difference in say, Fred Thompson and Ron Paul- both of which are federalists, but on the issue of abortion, Thompson always voted pro-life while Paul (in the votes I posted in a previous thread) thought it was more important to parse federalist words and vague references to the commerce clause than vote pro-life.
66 posted on
09/05/2007 5:33:36 PM PDT by
mnehring
(Cox/Craig 2008! Don't stall!!! (At least it makes more sense than Ron Paul.))
To: Mr. Lucky
>>>The fact is that federalizing morality has led to the wholesale legal slaughter of unborn children.<<<
Not exactly.
The fact of the matter is that FEDERAL JUDGES federalizing morality led to the wholesale legal slaughter of unborn children.
And they can do it again with this marriage issue, regardless of what the various states think.
94 posted on
09/05/2007 6:09:54 PM PDT by
CheyennePress
(Tennesseean for Romney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson