Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is China Quietly Dumping US Treasuries?
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 9-5-2007 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 09/05/2007 1:34:50 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: statered
A terrorist attack on America will not weaken the dollar it will strenghten it. Any perceived move towards a greater war footing in this country that could signal a wider and more intense effort on our part to clean up the ragheads and their money men will, imo, cause a flight to safety. When things really begin to get serious around the world then America is where people will put their cash.
41 posted on 09/05/2007 2:47:31 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
Nonsense! If they “take our currency down the tubes” they will destroy their own economy in doing so. The reason we are their best customer is because their currency is weak in relation to ours. It takes only a few dollars now to buy what would take many more dollars to buy should our currency “collapse”.

Keep in mind that America is 23+% of the entire worlds GDP and if we go so does the rest of the world.

42 posted on 09/05/2007 2:51:46 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn
This confers on the US a major economic advantage: the ability to run a trade deficit year after year. US always spends more than it earns, whereas the rest of the world always earns more than it spends.

That's just dead wrong and is an example of how misunderstood foreign trade and trade deficits are.

We do not "finance" our trade deficit through foreign borrowing. We pay for our foreign purchases with the profits we've earned in our domestic economy. We're creating wealth, trillions and trillions of it each year. If we spend some of it abroad or all of it here, it makes no difference.

Look, if I buy a 50lb bag of seed and grow it into 200 bushels of corn, then I've created about $500 or $600 of wealth that didn't exist before. Yes, I've got to deduct my expenses, but if spend all that profit abroad (on a new Chinese TV for example), neither I nor the government has had to borrow a single red yuan.

Worrying over the trade deficit is as senseless as fretting about global warming. Boob bait for economic bubbas.

43 posted on 09/05/2007 3:02:34 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

If they are dumping then somebody is buying


44 posted on 09/05/2007 3:17:25 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Nonsense! If they “take our currency down the tubes” they will destroy their own economy in doing so. The reason we are their best customer is because their currency is weak in relation to ours. It takes only a few dollars now to buy what would take many more dollars to buy should our currency “collapse”. Keep in mind that America is 23+% of the entire worlds GDP and if we go so does the rest of the world.

You're assuming your logic and reasoning is the same as their's, therefore they would never do such, however, different values and dogma drive different cultures. They may think they have a way around your expected results. They need us but don't forget they hate us and our freedom values. If they thought for a second they could knock us down to their level and not commit total utter economic suicide, they'd do it in a heartbeat. Their logic is not our logic.

45 posted on 09/05/2007 3:22:56 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE conservative candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blam

The speculation was that Chinese selling of US Treasuries would lead to a spike in US interest rates. In reality, the collapse of subprime has led to that spike. US business now have to pay more to borrow, whereas Treasury rates are trending down. Why is this? Treasury rates were artificially high because domestic and foreign investors disdained Treasuries for higher-yielding mortgage assets or corporate bonds. Once credit issues surfaced, they rushed back into Treasuries. Cash is once again king. This means Treasuries are back in vogue, regardless of what the Chinese do. Say what you will about Treasuries, but they are the only instruments with the taxing power of the United States Federal government behind them. I’ll take that taxing power over the credit rating of any financial firm or industrial behemoth any day of the week.


46 posted on 09/05/2007 3:32:13 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If you support free trade with Communist China...you are a Communist.

Plain and simple

Time to stop the anti-American nonsense


47 posted on 09/05/2007 3:32:14 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT; FARS; milford421; Founding Father

Ping.


48 posted on 09/05/2007 3:33:12 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (This is "Be an Angel Day", do something nice for someone today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The current state of the Treasury market - with lower rates than just a few months ago - just shows that possession of Treasuries give the Chinese zero leverage. It’s just the best place for them to park their cash. I would love to see them park their cash elsewhere - that would simply be a case of them cutting off their collective noses just to spite their faces.


49 posted on 09/05/2007 3:41:19 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Before long, they will be quietly invading.


50 posted on 09/05/2007 3:43:56 PM PDT by Califreak (Go Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

I heard a great interview with an economist about that so-called “nuclear option.” He laughed at the suggestion that China could do any damage at all to the U.S. economy — comparing their threat to a guy who walks into a bank, pulls out a gun, and threatens to blow his brains out if he doesn’t get all the money.


51 posted on 09/05/2007 3:49:06 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy; durasell
Worrying over the trade deficit is as senseless as fretting about global warming. Boob bait for economic bubbas.

When you're right, you're right.

52 posted on 09/05/2007 4:42:40 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Everything’s dandy!


53 posted on 09/05/2007 4:45:12 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: statered
anticipating a terrorist attack - a crippling one?

Or a war...

54 posted on 09/05/2007 4:47:25 PM PDT by null and void (I hate to suggest something this radical, but why not let the policy follow the facts? ~ReignOfError)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam

We’ve been trading real infrastructure for goods from overseas. The long-term vs. short-term gap is bridged with paper.


55 posted on 09/05/2007 4:48:58 PM PDT by P.O.E. (School's back in session. Please watch for school buses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

More so when you understand economics.


56 posted on 09/05/2007 5:40:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

That’s why they call economics “The Happy Science.”


57 posted on 09/05/2007 6:13:54 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

> If they are dumping then somebody is buying

Somebody was buying in 1929 too.


58 posted on 09/05/2007 6:21:29 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: old-ager
Somebody was buying in 1929 too.

And they got some great bargains
59 posted on 09/05/2007 6:32:03 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Toddsterrrrrrrr. You go girl!


60 posted on 09/05/2007 6:33:56 PM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson