No different. His stance on the WOT is a killer. Period. Paragraph.
Here we are in a fight for our country's survival. And here you Paulistas are, trying to align yourselves around definitions of 'declaration of war', etc. It's a pathetic argument, one that does disservice to this great nation and those who have given their lives for its existence, and you are shameful.
Does that answer your question?
Actually.... no it's not. Dr. Paul thinks we should fight a War as a War and not as Bush is doing with his "democracy building police action". The ROE are deplorable and Bush is doing nothing to halt the subversion of the war effort by Leftist a-holes like Upchuck Schumer.
Ron Paul's statements are clear. Fight a war if need be. Use ALL of the tools, including Privateers. And then get the hell out. With the sheer amount of destructive capacity we have at our disposal there is ZERO good reason we aren't done over there. Smash them, flatten everyththing, then get the hell out. If other ME countries want to send their troops in to stir the pot, smash them too. Enough of our boys dying because Bush won't so much as wag a finger at Achmedinijad.
If not... you are just wasting lives and tax payer money.
Yep, it sure does. It’s most fortunate for you that you were able to discern a percieved imperfection regarding earmarks to buttress your earlier opinion. It would be fascinating what you would have said if whichever candidate your supporting has allowed earmarks through. As a matter of fact, he probably has.