To: bcsco
If it makes you happy, I won’t say he’s against earmarks. He’s against pork government spending, of which earmarks are but a minor symptom that would die out, if the government would actually put into action the policies that he proposes.
To: marsh_of_mists
If it makes you happy, I won’t say he’s against earmarks. He’s against pork government spending, of which earmarks are but a minor symptom that would die out, if the government would actually put into action the policies that he proposes.Making me happy isn't the issue. It doesn't matter how you explain away his position; he's a fraud. I don't care how you define it. Period.
342 posted on
09/05/2007 5:22:57 PM PDT by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: marsh_of_mists
He’s against pork government spending, of which earmarks are but a minor symptom that would die out, if the government would actually put into action the policies that he proposes.Perhaps the government would more seriously consider his stance if he were 100% true to his commitment, and voted 'NO' both before and after the bills go to committee.
Hmmmmmm?
343 posted on
09/05/2007 5:26:40 PM PDT by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson