Read the guilty plea. It talks about the nature of the offense being phycisal in nature and not verbal, and about the signator knowing that an individual who thinks themselves not guilty should not, and would not be allowed to sign it. He signed it anyway.
I’m not in disagreement with the guilty plea, it’s Craig who’s trying to justify it and interpreting it to mean nothing really happened. There are cases that judges will toss the plea if circumstances change or new facts are discovered after the plea.