Both Mitt and Giuliani lose large groups that make up the Republican faction.
Fred doesn’t lose a single group, plus he appeals to many more conservative Dems.
Would you mind clarifying what you believe the issues are that are important to conservative dems, and why Fred appeals? I think there’s a serious misunderstanding amongst RNC types as to why blue dogs voted for Reagan. I’m curious to see if you’ve broken through that misunderstanding.
Mitt is running on the main three legs of conservative Republican beliefs: Strong military and defense; growth via low taxes and less regulation and conservative reforms; and family values. It’s the right unifying message for 2008 for the party, and he’s an articulate, very competent and good-character package for it that will be an appealing contrast to Hillary and the Democrats.